WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

990

It's an experimental injection and we don't know if this makes their bodies unable to kill off other types of infections due to a compromised immune system. I'm choosing to avoid anyone that has gotten the Covid vaccine for my safety.

It's an experimental injection and we don't know if this makes their bodies unable to kill off other types of infections due to a compromised immune system. I'm choosing to avoid anyone that has gotten the Covid vaccine for my safety.

(post is archived)

[–] 17 pts

My field is economics you fucking shill. I understand that a 1% chance of having complications from a flu is not worth a 5% chance of having complications from a vaccine that can't be "killed" or "treated" and is a permanent alteration of my body.

[–] 4 pts (edited )

^ This is why I think economists (reasonable ones) should be the last line of advisement for policy. Any time any other field takes the wheel we get overreach with very little consideration for unintended consequences. It's always very inefficient. Economists can use data provided to them by other experts. Dr. Fauci should not be directing medical policy. An economist should.

This is true from crime, immigration, work safety. An economist can make immigration policy much more efficient than building a wall. A request for your personal opinion.. What is the most effective way to spend $6 Billion on reducing illegal immigration. My instinct is to identify welfare leakage. You end up saving money and you reduce the incentives. They are moving here because some of their family is going to be on the receiving end of a mixed economy.

[–] 1 pt

Fauci should be making license plates.

Economics has been destroyed by kikes and agenda too. Look at someone like ((( Krugman ))). His entire set of principles shift depending what they are trying to push. The Fed is just pure politics as well. Sad how far economics and science has fell.

[–] 0 pt

This is why I think economists (reasonable ones) should be the last line of advisement for policy.

While this is an autists wet dream, there are problems with something like this. The biggest issue I could foresee- it sort of takes the "humanity" out of making policy. That might be what we need right NOW, for like a culling of sorts, but long-term it's too easily abused and the masses would never accept it. "We're all just numbers to you fucking autistic freaks making policy, fuck you!"- that kind of shit. Even if the autists are making the objectively best decisions for EVERYONE, that's how non-autists will view it, because non-autists will never understand the lack of empathy an autist can wield.