Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

149

After so long of being on welfare you should have to pay it back. There should be a set amount of time you have to get a job. If you can't there needs to be proof you've vigorously tried. Real proof. There would be reasonable repayment plans that don't overly burden the social welfare recipients it everything would be paid back.

After so long of being on welfare you should have to pay it back. There should be a set amount of time you have to get a job. If you can't there needs to be proof you've vigorously tried. Real proof. There would be reasonable repayment plans that don't overly burden the social welfare recipients it everything would be paid back.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (27).
[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

That is one reason they should have to pay it back. Thank your agreeing.

[–] • 0 pt

Try reading the comment again - those were two reasons showing just how ill-thought-out and impractical your suggestion is.

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

Hahahahahaha! Maybe you should reread and tell me just how having no repricusion to welfare is a good thing for them.

[–] • 0 pt

Welfare having no repercussions for a person means that those who are forced to rely on it for some time are more free to return to independent roles in society when they are able.

Piling debt upon the people in society who have the least ability to pay it back is really dumb, and would only perpetuate their welfare dependency.

Perhaps you could think of a smarter way to discourage people from becoming dependent on welfare, but I don't think so, you're not much of a thinker.