WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

994

After so long of being on welfare you should have to pay it back. There should be a set amount of time you have to get a job. If you can't there needs to be proof you've vigorously tried. Real proof. There would be reasonable repayment plans that don't overly burden the social welfare recipients it everything would be paid back.

After so long of being on welfare you should have to pay it back. There should be a set amount of time you have to get a job. If you can't there needs to be proof you've vigorously tried. Real proof. There would be reasonable repayment plans that don't overly burden the social welfare recipients it everything would be paid back.

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

Keep imagining that you're somehow different to a nigger in the eyes of those that matter.

There are too many worthy issues out there - I just think this issue isn't one that's going to change anything. US welfare spending is lower than most developed countries.

What's to stop your welfare recipients from declaring bankruptcy? Obviously welfare recipients aren't going to be paying back shit while they're on welfare... don't you think a mounting welfare debt would just encourage them to forever accept welfare and give up on becoming independent?

That is one reason they should have to pay it back. Thank your agreeing.

[–] 0 pt

Try reading the comment again - those were two reasons showing just how ill-thought-out and impractical your suggestion is.

Hahahahahaha! Maybe you should reread and tell me just how having no repricusion to welfare is a good thing for them.