Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

1.0K

TL;DR: In decentralized applications (of which Poal is not, but the future of the internet is decentralized) each individual using the application must decide, for themselves, who they want to receive content from, and who not to. This is censorship resistant because there isn't a central arbiter who is deciding what you can and cannot see; everyone has to make that choice on their own.

ie, if you don't like Poal giving you the ability to block faggots, then you're gonna have a hard time adjusting to the decentralized web.

edit: faggot

TL;DR: In decentralized applications (of which Poal is not, but the future of the internet is decentralized) each individual using the application must decide, *for themselves*, who they want to receive content from, and who not to. This is censorship resistant because there isn't a central arbiter who is deciding what you can and cannot see; everyone has to make that choice on their own. ie, if you don't like Poal giving you the ability to block faggots, then you're gonna have a hard time adjusting to the decentralized web. edit: faggot

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (23).
[–] [deleted] • -1 pt

How can I block robocallers if I don't allow all of them to spam my phone 24/7?

Imagine being this naive

[–] • 1 pt

Why is it everything you provide is retarded? That's rhetorical.

The question remains valid. It's a chicken and egg question. Your analogy isn't even on the same page.

[–] [deleted] • -1 pt

Incorrect. Allowing yourself to be bombarded by messages from every lunatic and idiot in the world is foolish. Only a shill who wants to flood your mind with what he wants you to see or an absolute naive fool thinks this way.

[–] • 0 pt (edited )

Try again when you're on topic and not dishonestly strawmanning and spamming.

As I said, why is it everything you provide is retarded? That's rhetorical.