WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

489

Everyone knows that the Faggot Known as Crensch bans any and all dissenting opinions because he wants to control the Qanon people. Nobody is quite sure what his homosexual ban criteria is exactly, but one thing that we can be sure of is that his quickly growing ban listing is comprised of those with dissenting opinion to his own.

By that metric, we can deduce that a created by the Faggot Known as Crensch are those users that more than likely have something worth saying.

EDIT: Alternatively, you can also check the from QStorm before it was rightfully revoked from The Faggot Known as Crensch... ironically for excessively banning users.

Everyone knows that the Faggot Known as Crensch bans any and all dissenting opinions because ***he wants to control the Qanon people***. Nobody is quite sure what his homosexual ban criteria is exactly, but one thing that we can be sure of is that his quickly growing ban listing is comprised of those with dissenting opinion to his own. By that metric, we can deduce that a [BAN LISTING](https://poal.co/s/QPatriots/bannedusers) created by the Faggot Known as Crensch are those users that more than likely have something *worth saying.* EDIT: Alternatively, you can also check the [OLD BAN LISTING](https://poal.co/s/QStorm/bannedusers) from QStorm before it was rightfully revoked from The Faggot Known as Crensch... ironically for excessively banning users.

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

Can you give some examples of the 'free speech' and 'dissenting opinion' that Crensch banned?

[–] 1 pt

Example:
- Banning masses of users which prevents their speech from reaching an audience

Literally, his reason for banning anyone is 'other'. Is this not illustrative enough for you?

[–] 0 pt (edited )

Well what if some idiot came into the guitar sub and wanted to talk about nothing but tambourines? And on top of that was belligerent about it?

You don't think, when there's tons of other subs to post in, that these people and the mod can engage in freedom of association?

Why is it your job, or others, to enlighten the Q people and tell them they're being led astray by Crensch? Are they not adults who can do what they want?

Why be so concerned about it? It sounds more personal with some of you guys. Who cares?

Is Crensch not simply exercising his own freedom to do what he wishes in his own neighborhood?

[–] 1 pt

no, and you are being a pilpul spouting kike defending a self admitted kike on a self admitted kike ran website

TheAmerican also has part ownership...you know...that giant niggerfaggot who openly spouts off about his love of little white boys...yea that faggot bans people too

fuck you and fuck your kike mother you stupid whore

[–] 0 pt (edited )

You have the ability and hopefully the capacity to tell that person to go away, or to not engage at all by ignoring it and to let their posts fall into irrelevancy long enough for them to stop.

Why do you need someone else to do something about it for you? Why do you trust for someone else to have the exact same foresight as you to block only those things that you disagree? How could they possibly block only that which you wish not to see?

Censorship is always a slippery-slope to manipulation. Only YOU can decide what is best for you to know. Crensch is clearly abusing his power; this is evident to the massive size and questionable reasons for his bannings.

When you read anything on QPatriots, you should be asking yourself "WHY am I only allowed to see what Crensch has deemed allowable for me to see?". If you can't answer that question, then you are being manipulated.

[–] 0 pt

Sure, here you go:

Thank goodness Operation Warp Speed hurried up and got that into her arm!

From "North Carolina • Kristi Simmonds, a registered nurse is suffering from a neurological & overall physical reaction to the poisonous Moderna Covid19 experimental mRNA injection that she received January 19, 2021." in

You are welcome.