Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

889

Everyone knows that the Faggot Known as Crensch bans any and all dissenting opinions because he wants to control the Qanon people. Nobody is quite sure what his homosexual ban criteria is exactly, but one thing that we can be sure of is that his quickly growing ban listing is comprised of those with dissenting opinion to his own.

By that metric, we can deduce that a created by the Faggot Known as Crensch are those users that more than likely have something worth saying.

EDIT: Alternatively, you can also check the from QStorm before it was rightfully revoked from The Faggot Known as Crensch... ironically for excessively banning users.

Everyone knows that the Faggot Known as Crensch bans any and all dissenting opinions because ***he wants to control the Qanon people***. Nobody is quite sure what his homosexual ban criteria is exactly, but one thing that we can be sure of is that his quickly growing ban listing is comprised of those with dissenting opinion to his own. By that metric, we can deduce that a [BAN LISTING](https://poal.co/s/QPatriots/bannedusers) created by the Faggot Known as Crensch are those users that more than likely have something *worth saying.* EDIT: Alternatively, you can also check the [OLD BAN LISTING](https://poal.co/s/QStorm/bannedusers) from QStorm before it was rightfully revoked from The Faggot Known as Crensch... ironically for excessively banning users.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (41).
[–] • 0 pt

I get a balance

GOOD! A lot of Q people stay only in those subs, and consume only the manipulation.

There is still a lot of Q spinning around here -- too much really considering the election and inauguration is over. Crensch is frankly holding those people as a captive audience whom could otherwise be contributing to providing insight in other subs, or themselves gain insight by going to others.

You should tell them to venture out of those subs, but then Crensch would ban you...

[–] • 0 pt

Hopefully they do, yes.

Q spinning, you mean still believing in and pushing Q although Q has been proven a larp?

I would, and many others, disagree with that (that Q has been disproven), but whatever, to each his own.

[–] • 0 pt

If you could quantify Q as proven, amongst the 5000 predictions, what percentage would you place upon it?

[–] • 0 pt

More so that Q has not been disproven but for those who haven't kept up with Q the past three years, it's understandable that they would think Q has been disproven.

I've given reasons for what I think before but can't go into them right now, just things Trump has said, military encampment of DC, etc.