You have the ability and hopefully the capacity to tell that person to go away, or to not engage at all by ignoring it and to let their posts fall into irrelevancy long enough for them to stop.
Why do you need someone else to do something about it for you? Why do you trust for someone else to have the exact same foresight as you to block only those things that you disagree? How could they possibly block only that which you wish not to see?
Censorship is always a slippery-slope to manipulation. Only YOU can decide what is best for you to know. Crensch is clearly abusing his power; this is evident to the massive size and questionable reasons for his bannings.
When you read anything on QPatriots, you should be asking yourself "WHY am I only allowed to see what Crensch has deemed allowable for me to see?". If you can't answer that question, then you are being manipulated.
Slippery slope' here is a bit overboard. The Q comments have trickled to not much anyway.
Anyway, I'm not that concerned with it, was just trying to get the reasoning.
Besides, I'm all over Poal, as I was Voat, so I get a balance, one can also see the deleted or banned stuff.
Maybe if things were more active I'd be more concerned. Not much going on at the moment.
I get a balance
GOOD! A lot of Q people stay only in those subs, and consume only the manipulation.
There is still a lot of Q spinning around here -- too much really considering the election and inauguration is over. Crensch is frankly holding those people as a captive audience whom could otherwise be contributing to providing insight in other subs, or themselves gain insight by going to others.
You should tell them to venture out of those subs, but then Crensch would ban you...
Hopefully they do, yes.
Q spinning, you mean still believing in and pushing Q although Q has been proven a larp?
I would, and many others, disagree with that (that Q has been disproven), but whatever, to each his own.
(post is archived)