Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

952

I went to church yesterday, and it came up, as is tradition. Something dawned on me, both evolution and creationism are essentially religious, and this was agreed on. Except, it feels like the sole purpose of evolution ism is to poison the well of information out there. Specifically when talking about the big bang theory, the guy did make a lot of points about how we know very little about what actually happened, and even the soundest theories of today have a ton of holes in them. And yet its being pushed as settled science, instead of what it should be which is incomplete assertions based on an idea of what could have happened. It's the same with climate change, half baked ideas being pushed as settled science, and all to control and lie to people, to make them question reality. Its like gaslighting into overdrive

I went to church yesterday, and it came up, as is tradition. Something dawned on me, both evolution and creationism are essentially religious, and this was agreed on. Except, it feels like the sole purpose of evolution ism is to poison the well of information out there. Specifically when talking about the big bang theory, the guy did make a lot of points about how we know very little about what actually happened, and even the soundest theories of today have a ton of holes in them. And yet its being pushed as settled science, instead of what it should be which is incomplete assertions based on an idea of what could have happened. It's the same with climate change, half baked ideas being pushed as settled science, and all to control and lie to people, to make them question reality. Its like gaslighting into overdrive

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (10).
[–] [deleted] • 1 pt

Accepted science is the best guess based upon data. If you have better ideas and the data to support them, then bring them up. Until then it's silly for anyone to act like the story of a interdimensional wizard waving his hand bringing everything we perceive into existence is more scientifically sound than any commonly accepted theory no matter that flaws.

[–] • 0 pt

Science is not, and never was, based on "best guess" or what seems most logical. "Commonly accepted theory" is often completely wrong.

And yes, an interdimentional wizard waving his hands and making shit happen is far, far more believable than the evolution bullshit being pushed on our children at an age where discernment is impossible and reliance on authority is demanded.

Just because something looks similar doesn't mean its related or part of an evolutionary chain of events.