Creatonism vs Evolutionism | Poal: Say what you want.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.

Click here to see all the comments (10).

[–] • 0 pt

Here's a topic both evolutionists and creations won't like. That evolution and creationism are both real insofar that evolution itself is intelligently designed 'by itself'. Evolution (the universe) is a self-replicating, error correcting algorithm. It has checksums to auto correct bad flaws and those checksums can be found in string theory equations. For the computer illiterate, a checksum is basically a digit representing the sum of the correct digits in a piece of stored or transmitted digital data, against which later comparisons can be made to detect errors in the data.

This is in our DNA as well and "evolution" is simply a sentient lifeform which permeates all organic matter, changes and evolves to better suit its surroundings. It is aware of its environment on a quantum level where the host organism is not; only a conscious understanding but no ability to influence the DNA. Take camouflaged species for example. The mainstream understanding is that animals which didn't have the camouflage were eaten or died because of inferior mutations compared to those with superior (natural selection). This is the best and most accepted theory, however, it does not explain species that have camouflage that look like other species

Take the snake caterpillar: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZzpY3gJgXQw https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1XUSYv7xgPo

The evolutionary design of this species contradicts mainstream science. Clearly, this caterpillar mutated to look like a predator of birds. How would a random soup of peptides and proteins "know" how to do this by random via natural selection? How would DNA "know" to randomly create a camouflage which represents a native species in this caterpillar's environment? Chance? Natural selection does not solve this.

Further, there is a time paradox happening. Let's consider natural selection is 100% correct and it took this caterpillar millions of years to evolve this way. Millions of years when dinosaurs were extinct and birds were evolving. How would it be possible, when birds did not exist, that a species would begin its mutation journey to mimic another species millions of years into the future? Follow? They would have to be evolving in tandem with one another.

Here's a topic both evolutionists and creations won't like. That evolution and creationism are both real insofar that evolution itself is intelligently designed 'by itself'. Evolution (the universe) is a self-replicating, error correcting algorithm. It has checksums to auto correct bad flaws and those checksums can be found in string theory equations. For the computer illiterate, a checksum is basically a digit representing the sum of the correct digits in a piece of stored or transmitted digital data, against which later comparisons can be made to detect errors in the data. This is in our DNA as well and "evolution" is simply a sentient lifeform which permeates all organic matter, changes and evolves to better suit its surroundings. It is aware of its environment on a quantum level where the host organism is not; only a conscious understanding but no ability to influence the DNA. Take camouflaged species for example. The mainstream understanding is that animals which didn't have the camouflage were eaten or died because of inferior mutations compared to those with superior (natural selection). This is the best and most accepted theory, however, it does not explain species that have camouflage *that look like other species* Take the snake caterpillar: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZzpY3gJgXQw https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1XUSYv7xgPo The evolutionary design of this species contradicts mainstream science. Clearly, this caterpillar mutated to look like a predator of birds. How would a random soup of peptides and proteins "know" how to do this by random via natural selection? How would DNA "know" to randomly create a camouflage which represents a native species in this caterpillar's environment? Chance? Natural selection does not solve this. Further, there is a time paradox happening. Let's consider natural selection is 100% correct and it took this caterpillar millions of years to evolve this way. Millions of years when dinosaurs were extinct and birds were evolving. How would it be possible, when birds did not exist, that a species would begin its mutation journey to mimic another species millions of years into the future? Follow? They would have to be evolving in tandem with one another. [Epic Thread Here](http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread832446/pg1)

link