Can you recreate any of the miracles in the bible? No? Can we recreate science experiments? Yes? Well guess which religion has a head start on the believability chart. not saying one is right...
Genetics is real population genetics drift over time due to selective breeding happening knowingly or unknowingly in the population. This is proven fact unless you fundamentally believe DNA doesn't exist and we aren't capable of sequencing it. Being a race realist means you necessarily cant take an creationist approach. It's interesting how the left has essentially embraced creationism. I don't think this necessarily has anything to do with classic religions just individual interpretations of them.
Accepted science is the best guess based upon data. If you have better ideas and the data to support them, then bring them up. Until then it's silly for anyone to act like the story of a interdimensional wizard waving his hand bringing everything we perceive into existence is more scientifically sound than any commonly accepted theory no matter that flaws.
Science is not, and never was, based on "best guess" or what seems most logical. "Commonly accepted theory" is often completely wrong.
And yes, an interdimentional wizard waving his hands and making shit happen is far, far more believable than the evolution bullshit being pushed on our children at an age where discernment is impossible and reliance on authority is demanded.
Just because something looks similar doesn't mean its related or part of an evolutionary chain of events.
Here's a good 3 minute debate that may answer some questions...
Darwinian evolution is a fact. You're mixing it up with cosmology (big bang) which is speculative and a totally different subject.
Here's a topic both evolutionists and creations won't like. That evolution and creationism are both real insofar that evolution itself is intelligently designed 'by itself'. Evolution (the universe) is a self-replicating, error correcting algorithm. It has checksums to auto correct bad flaws and those checksums can be found in string theory equations. For the computer illiterate, a checksum is basically a digit representing the sum of the correct digits in a piece of stored or transmitted digital data, against which later comparisons can be made to detect errors in the data.
This is in our DNA as well and "evolution" is simply a sentient lifeform which permeates all organic matter, changes and evolves to better suit its surroundings. It is aware of its environment on a quantum level where the host organism is not; only a conscious understanding but no ability to influence the DNA. Take camouflaged species for example. The mainstream understanding is that animals which didn't have the camouflage were eaten or died because of inferior mutations compared to those with superior (natural selection). This is the best and most accepted theory, however, it does not explain species that have camouflage that look like other species
Take the snake caterpillar: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZzpY3gJgXQw https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1XUSYv7xgPo
The evolutionary design of this species contradicts mainstream science. Clearly, this caterpillar mutated to look like a predator of birds. How would a random soup of peptides and proteins "know" how to do this by random via natural selection? How would DNA "know" to randomly create a camouflage which represents a native species in this caterpillar's environment? Chance? Natural selection does not solve this.
Further, there is a time paradox happening. Let's consider natural selection is 100% correct and it took this caterpillar millions of years to evolve this way. Millions of years when dinosaurs were extinct and birds were evolving. How would it be possible, when birds did not exist, that a species would begin its mutation journey to mimic another species millions of years into the future? Follow? They would have to be evolving in tandem with one another.
Neither. I believe we were created though genetic manipulation. We were designed by other beings. Call me what you will. That's what makes the most sense to me.
making -ISMS your idol is very semitic, please continue, goy
(post is archived)