I'm thinking of blocking your because you whine too much and keep calling adult owls babies.
What the fuck is wrong with you, boy?
I'm artistic.
Didnt you block him first?
Yes but I had a good reason (they post normie links with no archives) but that was before blocking prevented him from commenting on my posts. I saw their comments rolled up and usually read them. I just wanted to not see their submissions.
Since the site config changed I unblocked everyone, because I think blocking that way is fake and gay. Now I just tolerate seeing their posts.
Huh, I see your point. And I like it.
>Yes but I had a good reason (they post normie links with no archives)
God you're so fucking cringey
Upvoted for using the correct form of "you're". I come to sites like Poal to see what CNN doesn't want me to see, not to see what CNN says.
The blocking users function was a huge mistake.
i dont know, its kind of nice not to have to listen to the_americans bullshit
...then don't read it. Why should your preferences affect what I get to read?
Maybe I should block you so that nobody has to read what you have to say.
but the block user feature does not ban people you fucking retard, it stops you from seeing my posts but not other people, if you dont think my comments are worth reading you should block me
i would block you but sometimes you do add to the conversation, most of the time you seem a bit retarded though
i really dont care if you want to block me, it does not effect me in the slightest, why should i care?
I had them blocked too until the changes were made. Now I just keep scrolling. I agree though, that user contributes virtually nothing of value here that I have seen.
(post is archived)