Why would China care about what a country that's spent the last 20 years doing false flags thinks?
Why would China care about what a country that's spent the last 20 years doing false flags thinks?
And maybe they're all already sanctioned, I don't know. Maybe there is something more that could be done to disrupt their soft power activities in SE Asia, maybe in Malaysia where these CCP agents seem to have made their operations hub. To do so would send a clear message to the CCP, "We know what you're doing, we know what you've done, and we don't like it".
These oil firms have had tremendous sway over the Myanmar Junta and are the reason why the Junta cracked down on the Saffron Revolution in 2007 and later the Rohingya. Both of these conflicts revolved around petroleum products. In the Saffron Revolution the people protested against unbearable gasoline prices imposed on the people by the Junta, surely at the advisement of Chinese petroleum companies. Later in the Rakhine state the Rohingya demanded a cut of transported oil revenue, if I remember correctly.
I would focus on employees of the "China Overseas Petroleum Corporation", who have property and run Chinese soft power campaigns in other SE Asian countries like Malaysia as well as the Western world. They were intimately involved with the decision to use force against the Saffron Revolution as I understand it.
If you really want to kick the hornets' nest and force China to show their hand in the coup in Myanmar, you could float the offer to the Myanmar Junta that they could nationalize these oil pipelines that feed China and then lease the rights to use them to US companies. In exchange, the USA would offer military support to the state of Myanmar and aid the Junta in transitioning to an autonomous Democratic Republic Conservatorship where the Junta have veto power for a certain number of years. The mere proposition would certainly drive China into a hysteric frenzy, demonstrating that in fact they were involved in the decision to suspend democracy in Myanmar.
I do not think the West, or any country for that matter, should beat the drums in favor of the Rohingya (Bangali), which in the lense of SE Asian view as I understand it are illegitimate inhabitants of Myanmar. Doing so will only shift SE Asian attitudes against the Western world and in favor of China. If other SE Asian nations, such as Malaysia, would not object portraying the Muslim Rohingya in a negative light, it might be adviseable to tell the Burmese side of the story to gain afffinity with Western states through sympathetic media. Ultimately, trying to stir international outrage against the Junta's decision to expel the Rohingya was fruitless and only distanced Myanmar from the West, it was a mistake I think.
Instead, I would focus on the Saffron Revolution and present an opportunity for the Junta to resolve their conflicts with the Myanmar public which were instigated by dependence on CCP soft power economics.
On the off chance that the Myanmar Junta accept the West's offer of support, it would fuck up China's plans to take SE Asia as well as distrupt their economy to a degree and make them more reliant on pursuing the capture of the Indo-Pacific. If Myanmar accepts the USA's support, instead of China having access to the India's borders and the interior of SE Asia, the USA would have another ally and perhaps troops on China's border. In addition, it would cut off China's influence in the West that occurs via drug trafficking through Myanmar, and perhaps financial institutions via their oil business through Myanmar.
I would not use Jews in any capacity to negotiate anything with Myanmar, or the Indo-Pacific for that matter. Asia is anti-Jewish. Recognize it, accept it, and compensate for it. You should realize that these pipelines going through Myanmar were not without asistance from Goldman Sachs, a company that has gained disrepute in SE Asian countries as a malicious Western actor, not least of all because of 1MDB, a scam perpetrated by Semites and Han upon Malaysia. Goldman Sachs and anyone associated with it will have a conflict of interest in addressing Myanmar because they have been involved with creating its problems and will not want Western media or government drawing attention to that or evaluating whether or not they aided the CCP in their soft power invasion into SE Asia.
I would exclusively use White people as ambassadors and White owned companies as intermediaries for any business arrangement, negotiation, and as representatives of the West. Sending a Jew to represent the USA I'm sure would be met with suspicion and regarded as yet another scam. And never ever present multi-ethnicism as a positive thing in SE Asian states, many of them have more than enough experience with multi-ethnicism under colonialization and they do not want it. Read the room.
I think it would be wise to consult with Indo-Pacific nations before making any decision, for their insight into the issue and because, depending on how Myanmar goes, they may face a desperate war with China in the SE Asian interior and Indian Ocean.
And maybe they're all already sanctioned, I don't know. Maybe there is something more that could be done to disrupt their soft power activities in SE Asia, maybe in Malaysia where these CCP agents seem to have made their operations hub. To do so would send a clear message to the CCP, "We know what you're doing, we know what you've done, and we don't like it".
These oil firms have had tremendous sway over the Myanmar Junta and are the reason why the Junta cracked down on the Saffron Revolution in 2007 and later the Rohingya. Both of these conflicts revolved around petroleum products. In the Saffron Revolution the people protested against unbearable gasoline prices imposed on the people by the Junta, surely at the advisement of Chinese petroleum companies. Later in the Rakhine state the Rohingya demanded a cut of transported oil revenue, if I remember correctly.
I would focus on employees of the "China Overseas Petroleum Corporation", who have property and run Chinese soft power campaigns in other SE Asian countries like Malaysia as well as the Western world. They were intimately involved with the decision to use force against the Saffron Revolution as I understand it.
If you really want to kick the hornets' nest and force China to show their hand in the coup in Myanmar, you could float the offer to the Myanmar Junta that they could nationalize these oil pipelines that feed China and then lease the rights to use them to US companies. In exchange, the USA would offer military support to the state of Myanmar and aid the Junta in transitioning to an autonomous Democratic Republic Conservatorship where the Junta have veto power for a certain number of years. The mere proposition would certainly drive China into a hysteric frenzy, demonstrating that in fact they were involved in the decision to suspend democracy in Myanmar.
I do not think the West, or any country for that matter, should beat the drums in favor of the Rohingya (Bangali), which in the lense of SE Asian view as I understand it are illegitimate inhabitants of Myanmar. Doing so will only shift SE Asian attitudes against the Western world and in favor of China. If other SE Asian nations, such as Malaysia, would not object portraying the Muslim Rohingya in a negative light, it might be adviseable to tell the Burmese side of the story to gain afffinity with Western states through sympathetic media. Ultimately, trying to stir international outrage against the Junta's decision to expel the Rohingya was fruitless and only distanced Myanmar from the West, it was a mistake I think.
Instead, I would focus on the Saffron Revolution and present an opportunity for the Junta to resolve their conflicts with the Myanmar public which were instigated by dependence on CCP soft power economics.
On the off chance that the Myanmar Junta accept the West's offer of support, it would fuck up China's plans to take SE Asia as well as distrupt their economy to a degree and make them more reliant on pursuing the capture of the Indo-Pacific. If Myanmar accepts the USA's support, instead of China having access to the India's borders and the interior of SE Asia, the USA would have another ally and perhaps troops on China's border. In addition, it would cut off China's influence in the West that occurs via drug trafficking through Myanmar, and perhaps financial institutions via their oil business through Myanmar.
I would not use Jews in any capacity to negotiate anything with Myanmar, or the Indo-Pacific for that matter. Asia is anti-Jewish. Recognize it, accept it, and compensate for it. You should realize that these pipelines going through Myanmar were not without asistance from Goldman Sachs, a company that has gained disrepute in SE Asian countries as a malicious Western actor, not least of all because of 1MDB, a scam perpetrated by Semites and Han upon Malaysia. Goldman Sachs and anyone associated with it will have a conflict of interest in addressing Myanmar because they have been involved with creating its problems and will not want Western media or government drawing attention to that or evaluating whether or not they aided the CCP in their soft power invasion into SE Asia.
I would exclusively use White people as ambassadors and White owned companies as intermediaries for any business arrangement, negotiation, and as representatives of the West. Sending a Jew to represent the USA I'm sure would be met with suspicion and regarded as yet another scam. And never ever present multi-ethnicism as a positive thing in SE Asian states, many of them have more than enough experience with multi-ethnicism under colonialization and they do not want it. Read the room.
I think it would be wise to consult with Indo-Pacific nations before making any decision, for their insight into the issue and because, depending on how Myanmar goes, they may face a desperate war with China in the SE Asian interior and Indian Ocean.
(post is archived)