WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

601

See for Crensch trying to position himself as owner at QStorm, but when he couldn't he created a new sub called instead, which then gained twice as many subscribers in just a few hours as there were even posts in the sub! I called him out and he admitted to it, then banned me. If Crensch believed in the Q movement, he would be just fine as a mod at QStorm instead, right? Why does he need to control it too? This whole thing is a classic divide and conquer tactic.

See in case he tries to delete the post.

CRENSCH IS TRYING TO TAKE OVER THE Q MOVEMENT! For what end Crensch?

Say what you will, but Crensch has literally divided the Q audience on Poal. What are your thoughts Q people?

See [HERE](https://poal.co/s/QStorm/291753) for Crensch trying to position himself as owner at QStorm, but when he couldn't he created a new sub called [QPatriots](https://poal.co/s/QPatriots) instead, which then gained *twice* as many subscribers in just a few hours as there were even posts in the sub! I called him out [ON IT](https://poal.co/s/QPatriots/292311) and he admitted to it, then banned me. If Crensch believed in the Q movement, he would be just fine as a mod at QStorm instead, right? Why does he need to control it too? This whole thing is a classic divide and conquer tactic. See [HERE](https://files.catbox.moe/q81n8g.jpg) in case he tries to delete the post. ***CRENSCH IS TRYING TO TAKE OVER THE Q MOVEMENT!*** For what end Crensch? Say what you will, but Crensch has literally divided the Q audience on Poal. What are your thoughts Q people?

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

That's a good question, and a good tactic is to fill places of legitimacy with your own message from as many 'people' as possible to create consensus, and thus manipulate real people.

[–] 0 pt

yea you're still doing it kike.

are the "real people" real people too?

or are you just making a rule and assuming that happens?

[–] 1 pt

It's called 'consensus cracking' bro, but you knew that... right?

[–] 0 pt

i would imagine that a relevant and popular subject could totally do some "consensus cracking".

RELEVANT

and

POPULAR