Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

1.2K

See for Crensch trying to position himself as owner at QStorm, but when he couldn't he created a new sub called instead, which then gained twice as many subscribers in just a few hours as there were even posts in the sub! I called him out and he admitted to it, then banned me. If Crensch believed in the Q movement, he would be just fine as a mod at QStorm instead, right? Why does he need to control it too? This whole thing is a classic divide and conquer tactic.

See in case he tries to delete the post.

CRENSCH IS TRYING TO TAKE OVER THE Q MOVEMENT! For what end Crensch?

Say what you will, but Crensch has literally divided the Q audience on Poal. What are your thoughts Q people?

See [HERE](https://poal.co/s/QStorm/291753) for Crensch trying to position himself as owner at QStorm, but when he couldn't he created a new sub called [QPatriots](https://poal.co/s/QPatriots) instead, which then gained *twice* as many subscribers in just a few hours as there were even posts in the sub! I called him out [ON IT](https://poal.co/s/QPatriots/292311) and he admitted to it, then banned me. If Crensch believed in the Q movement, he would be just fine as a mod at QStorm instead, right? Why does he need to control it too? This whole thing is a classic divide and conquer tactic. See [HERE](https://files.catbox.moe/q81n8g.jpg) in case he tries to delete the post. ***CRENSCH IS TRYING TO TAKE OVER THE Q MOVEMENT!*** For what end Crensch? Say what you will, but Crensch has literally divided the Q audience on Poal. What are your thoughts Q people?

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (31).
[–] • 0 pt (edited )

This new

Holy shit dude, I literally just explained to you how it works.

Post: This thing is true
Alt account reply: Yes I agree
Alt account reply: Wow so true
Alt account reply: I didn't agree before but now I do
Alt account reply: This is even more true now than ever
Real person: Hmm, I guess this is true

[–] • 0 pt

you have no evidence that the "real person" exists.

Yes I get it.

and I asked you several responses ago to stop assuming the existence of the "real person"

but you aren't doing that.

[–] • 1 pt

Define 'real', define 'natural'.

An alt-fake real person? A bot? There are plenty of real actual humans that follow Q.

[–] • 1 pt

Bro, Damnberries is a useless faggot, why are you wasting time?

[–] • 0 pt

are there?

are there lots of them?