Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

641

This is the end of discourse on Poal.

I could let it slide on individual subs, but this is too far; ideas gone unmolested is the promotion of cancer... I suppose that I will have to find a new home.

EDIT: I propose the following solution.

Instead of outright blocking individual users, their replies and conversations are INSTEAD automatically collapsed so that their speech is not infringed upon by allowing the choice to see it, and that those blocking them don't have to see it if they choose not to.

See for petition to change it.

This is the end of discourse on Poal. I could let it slide on individual subs, but this is too far; ideas gone unmolested is the promotion of cancer... I suppose that I will have to find a new home. EDIT: I propose the following solution. >Instead of outright blocking individual users, their replies and conversations are INSTEAD automatically collapsed so that their speech is not infringed upon by allowing the *choice* to see it, and that those blocking them don't have to see it if they *choose* not to. See [HERE](https://poal.co/s/IdeasForPoal/291456) for petition to change it.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (78).
[–] • 1 pt (edited )

Because those people attack my truth the most.

How do you intend to know if what you believe is true if you live in an echo chamber; how do you think that Twitter got the way that it did?

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

I think you can make your own thread with a link to the post blocked to you and prove them wrong.

[–] • 1 pt

Why should I have to? Why should anyone have the ability to prevent their ideas from going directly unchallenged?

Your argument is contrary to the very reason that the "Fuck You!" option exists on polls, yet it is vigorously defended.

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

If someone doesn't like you, he has the right to avoid you. It's how society works.