If I cannot post a reply to your post, other people are not able to read the reply that I would have posted. By blocking my ability to reply to your post, you are deciding for everyone else that they shouldn't be allowed to read what I have to say about whatever you post.
You can block me without blocking my ability to post for everyone else to see. If you don't want to be annoyed by what I have to say, fine. But why decide that for everyone else?
With great power comes responsibility.
If a user blocked you, why would you want to waste your time commenting knowing they don't care about what you have to say.
Post: "All Trannies are Hot and Valid"
"This user has blocked you from responding to their posts and comments"
Reply: "OMG they are so hot and valid!"
Reply: "Wow, my mind has changed in all of this"
Reply: "Looks like this normal"
Reply: "Totally normal. Hey, what do you think of trans children?"
You are implying that OP can block an unlimited amount of users. They can't block all poal user base and will eventually have to answer to users who disagree with them.
Ok. This is how it went down on Gab. Cernobitch used to post on Gab. People called him a rapist, because he raped a bitch. He blocked everyone that mentioned it. He eventually left Gab because he couldn't prevent others from posting on his comments, so others, his followers, learned that Cerno raped a bitch.
Yes. I could have just blocked all Cerno's content and said fuck that guy.
Lauren Southern. Same thing. Grifter pieces of shit, ripping people off, getting rich by feeding boomer idiots pure garbage. Yes. I could have just blocked her.
That's why blocking users is limited to 50 slots.
(post is archived)