WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

223

(post is archived)

[–] 18 pts

BET THEY WERE DANCING!

Yes, the dance. (youtu.be)

[–] 2 pts

its just a stomp. they have ruined buildings just by "dancing". these guys are all "bonding" too.

[–] [deleted] 0 pt (edited )

His last name is (((Fraser)))...I doubt he's going to expose the nose with his tweet. Plus he's sporting a face diaper under his double chin and soy boy mug.

[–] 7 pts

Noooo stop noticing goyem!!

[–] 7 pts

The most dangerous thing the Q larp did was tell people to do their own research and we are all in this against the evil fucks making this world a degenerate shit hole..

Research will let you know really quick who the evil fucks are

[–] 3 pts

I don't think you realize how stupid "Q-research" was. When Qikes talked about "research" they meant pouring through stupid Q messages and Trump tweets trying to piece together messages.

[–] 2 pts

Ya good point actually.. I always thought of it as rabbit hole research but ya going back and researching Q nastrodumous post is not a good way to research for sure

[–] 2 pts

Q was a distraction for the people already doing that.

[–] [deleted] -1 pt

No, pointlessly shitting on Q was an inorganic distraction for people who were already seeking the truth on their own.

[–] 2 pts

Q was a cognitive trap for people that escaped the trap of conservatism and was more filled with grifters than the worst day possible at 4chan

[–] 4 pts

It is, who it always is.

[–] [deleted] 3 pts

Whats the answer? Who took out huge short positions before it. I’m guessing every kike bank.

[–] 5 pts (edited )

Certainly Lucky Larry Silverstein and his family/friends.

lucky Larry (files.catbox.moe)

[–] [deleted] 3 pts

I know about him and his insurance policy. Apparently big banks shorted airlines too. These fucking kikes.

[–] 3 pts

Honestly asking, where would I find this information?

[–] 1 pt

On the internet

[–] 1 pt

Right after cat pictures but before the porn.

[–] 0 pt

But what if all I have is Cat-porn?

[–] 2 pts

Did anyone make a list back then right after it happened? Seems like a hard thing to search for.

[+] [deleted] 1 pt
[–] 2 pts
[–] 5 pts

LOL Snopes ..LOL

[–] 0 pt (edited )

Looks like you found a kike plant. Probably Hasbara, let's report him! In one month he has over 600 posts, working full time!

[–] 0 pt

So you're going with a twitter question and your narrative. I get it, you've weaponized your ignorance.

[–] -1 pt

First information bias.

Believe the first thing you hear no matter the evidence. Then aguing against newer information no matter how well sources it is.

[–] 4 pts (edited )

>Highly publicized allegations of insider trading in advance of 9/11 generally rest on reports of unusual pre-9/11 trading activity in companies whose stock plummeted after the attacks. Some unusual trading did in fact occur, but each such trade proved to have an innocuous explanation. For example, the volume of put options — instruments that pay off only when a stock drops in price — surged in the parent companies of United Airlines on September 6 and American Airlines on September 10 — highly suspicious trading on its face. Yet, further investigation has revealed that the trading had no connection with 9/11. A single U.S.-based institutional investor with no conceivable ties to al Qaeda purchased 95 percent of the UAL puts on September 6 as part of a trading strategy that also included buying 115,000 shares of American on September 10. Similarly, much of the seemingly suspicious trading in American on September 10 was traced to a specific U.S.-based options trading newsletter, faxed to its subscribers on Sunday, September 9, which recommended these trades. The SEC and FBI, aided by other agencies and the securities industry, devoted enormous resources to investigating this issue, including securing the cooperation of many foreign governments. These investigators have found that the apparently suspicious consistently proved innocuous.

Yeah... As if looking at al qaeda ties was necessarily the right approach here...

The rebuttal is weak, tbh, it's not even sourced

Of course I say that I say nothing

[–] 5 pts

That's a big paragraph to say Jews.

[–] 0 pt

So say NOTHING YOU FUCKING STUPID TWAT. I’m Jk honey buns I love you.

[–] 1 pt

I bet they're jews.

Load more (8 replies)