WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

201

Propagandize the left, not the right.

The right focuses on ideas, and the ideas it was given were designed to put a limit on their radicalization, an ideological trap.

The left focuses on messenger over message, and are highly demoralized. Demoralization can be broken by in-group shaming/belonging/identity and loosely indoctrination. The reason this was setup this way was because as long as the left could be made authoritarian, it could be separated from the individualism/rightwing pattern of intellectualism, which is what was used to drive political upheaval in european nations by merging the radicalism of the left with the intellectual capacity of the right, where the right served to act as the medium by which discourse and thought allowed a free exchange of 1. ideas, 2. leadership, and eventually 3. material support between the middle class and the lower class against the upper class, or one faction of the upper class utilizing the middle/lower class against another faction of the upperclass.

The left are more readily a golem than the right, their identity is more fluid. And its why the state works so hard to push 'left' on the younger generations, again, their identities aren't set in stone. So they can be turned with effort. But once turned they're pretty reliable in terms of their reactions and desire to act.

What must be done is to sell the equivalent of nationalism and ethnocentrism to the left. It will probably be through eco-fronts and loose associations with 'paganism' or paganist messages.

Propagandize the left, not the right. The right focuses on ideas, and the ideas it was given were designed to put a limit on their radicalization, an ideological trap. The left focuses on messenger over message, and are highly demoralized. Demoralization can be broken by in-group shaming/belonging/identity and loosely indoctrination. The reason this was setup this way was because as long as the left could be made authoritarian, it could be separated from the individualism/rightwing pattern of intellectualism, which is what was used to drive political upheaval in european nations by merging the radicalism of the left with the intellectual capacity of the right, where the right served to act as the medium by which discourse and thought allowed a free exchange of 1. ideas, 2. leadership, and eventually 3. material support between the middle class and the lower class against the upper class, or one faction of the upper class utilizing the middle/lower class against another faction of the upperclass. The left are more readily a golem than the right, their identity is more fluid. And its why the state works so hard to push 'left' on the younger generations, again, their identities aren't set in stone. So they can be turned with effort. But once turned they're pretty reliable in terms of their reactions and desire to act. What must be done is to sell the equivalent of nationalism and ethnocentrism to the left. It will probably be through eco-fronts and loose associations with 'paganism' or paganist messages.

(post is archived)

[+] [deleted] 1 pt