WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

1.1K

Propagandize the left, not the right.

The right focuses on ideas, and the ideas it was given were designed to put a limit on their radicalization, an ideological trap.

The left focuses on messenger over message, and are highly demoralized. Demoralization can be broken by in-group shaming/belonging/identity and loosely indoctrination. The reason this was setup this way was because as long as the left could be made authoritarian, it could be separated from the individualism/rightwing pattern of intellectualism, which is what was used to drive political upheaval in european nations by merging the radicalism of the left with the intellectual capacity of the right, where the right served to act as the medium by which discourse and thought allowed a free exchange of 1. ideas, 2. leadership, and eventually 3. material support between the middle class and the lower class against the upper class, or one faction of the upper class utilizing the middle/lower class against another faction of the upperclass.

The left are more readily a golem than the right, their identity is more fluid. And its why the state works so hard to push 'left' on the younger generations, again, their identities aren't set in stone. So they can be turned with effort. But once turned they're pretty reliable in terms of their reactions and desire to act.

What must be done is to sell the equivalent of nationalism and ethnocentrism to the left. It will probably be through eco-fronts and loose associations with 'paganism' or paganist messages.

Propagandize the left, not the right. The right focuses on ideas, and the ideas it was given were designed to put a limit on their radicalization, an ideological trap. The left focuses on messenger over message, and are highly demoralized. Demoralization can be broken by in-group shaming/belonging/identity and loosely indoctrination. The reason this was setup this way was because as long as the left could be made authoritarian, it could be separated from the individualism/rightwing pattern of intellectualism, which is what was used to drive political upheaval in european nations by merging the radicalism of the left with the intellectual capacity of the right, where the right served to act as the medium by which discourse and thought allowed a free exchange of 1. ideas, 2. leadership, and eventually 3. material support between the middle class and the lower class against the upper class, or one faction of the upper class utilizing the middle/lower class against another faction of the upperclass. The left are more readily a golem than the right, their identity is more fluid. And its why the state works so hard to push 'left' on the younger generations, again, their identities aren't set in stone. So they can be turned with effort. But once turned they're pretty reliable in terms of their reactions and desire to act. What must be done is to sell the equivalent of nationalism and ethnocentrism to the left. It will probably be through eco-fronts and loose associations with 'paganism' or paganist messages.

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

Wait which one? The Joker-face guy?

[–] 0 pt

No, MartinezPerspective.

Joker-face guy has to realize hes probably gonna get raised for coming off as unstable.

I can see what going through the shit that he went through might do to some people of course.

[–] 1 pt

Oh yeah that guy is pretty straight up.

I will say in my estimation, he goes a bit overboard calling people niggers to their face, and telling them they’re inferior. Regardless of whether it’s “factual” or “justified”, you can’t show it to normies without it shutting them down. Most people just don’t feel that much visceral hate that they’d relate to that.

I’m not saying he’s wrong to do so, just that it’s a bit too spicy to qualify as “just the facts”.

[–] 1 pt

I’m not saying he’s wrong to do so, just that it’s a bit too spicy to qualify as “just the facts”.

I agree. I think hes going for shock and awe. Maybe to immediately weed out any of those who he'll never reach, leaving only those who will at least listen, even if they are offended in the process.

It's important to let an idea percolate and give people a chance to hear it. The problem was always the amount of effort it took to determine who would even listen, and who was just there to argue in addition to their being offended.