we did need the troops in the middle east to fight the soviets in the cold war, and guarantee trade for the european empires that were then designated to fight the soviets because america stopped the Third Reich from finishing the job.
I can see that you're a q tard and that means you've circle jerked about in accurate information about ww2, but germany did not believe america would attack them, and the Fuhrer and his generals even believed at the last moment that america switched sides in order to help them fight the soviets. do you believe that this group of highly intelligent men ignorantly thought this would really happen and genuinely hold out hope without cursing america in the process? that's a rhetorical question.
it's true that right now we don't NEED any troops there, but for no reason that you would ever give. the actual reason is because of expiring agreements from post ww2 and the cold war. and the other incentive for us to remain in the ME is the oil to support the petrol dollar, which is a smart idea and if we didn't have shale and our own oil we SHOULD remain there, and everyone else has an incentive to keep america there as well because it secures the globe trade, but you didn't know this.
We had no business fighting Russia by proxy in the ME. The proxy wars were for Israel not the benefit of the US.
No more brother wars.
We had no business fighting Russia by proxy in the ME
I didn't say we did. Also, i'm not sure what the entire deal is there, but the expressed goal is that trade routes be preserved, and the problems the US had with Russia there wouldn't be correlated to the cold war, that's correct.
Israel certainly has been causing each and every problem there that is reported in the news with mystical causes and ridiculous calls-to-action without explanation while using inflammatory language.
(post is archived)