Finally, an actually thought-out answer. Thank you. >Manuel Noriega Assuming by Norega, you mean Noriega. Noriega wasn't a very reputable man, who often sold out to the highest bid, which most often was the US. He also had a criminal history, being raised from a struggling family in an impoverished location. During his election, he was the suspected murderer of his personal rival, Hugo Spadafora, who vowed to fight Noriega, so he doesn't win the Panamanian election. He won the election a few years later and no longer sold anything to the US, which is what prompted the invasion. Or it was the Jews, which lacks evidence, as Noriega never spoke negatively of Israel. However, according to Michael Harari, who only knew Noriega as an impersonal acquaintance, Israel offered Noriega a safe haven to retire to avoid the US. If Israel controls the US, then why did Israel offer to help Noriega? > Che Couldn't find anything about Che on Israel or of Jews. [However, he was plenty of aggressive and critical of the United States. The United States hated Che, even to the point of refusing to listen to his United Nations speech, walking off their seats.](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bufHojkoGtw) >Chavez Chavez died from cancer, and the United States never bombed Venezuela. Maduro accused the US of poisoning Chavez with a cancer-virus, however, never supplied any evidence or proof of such a thing occurring. Chavez was critical of Israel's fascism and attack on Lebanon and Palestine and called the United States a fascist dictatorship. Chavez was also a great ally of Iran, which is a country that the US does not have steady relations with. >Castro Fidel Castro was also negative about the West, China, and Iran; any could have killed him. [He's also a strong advocate for remembering the atrocities of the holocaust.](https://www.cbsnews.com/news/castro-blasts-ahmadinejad-for-holocaust-denial/) I know that Neo-Nazism believes that the holocaust was fake and is only put forward to make the masses submissive to Israel or whatever. >Qadafi Qadafi was angry over how the West handled the Israel-Palestine border and wanted to push for peace between the two nations. His criticism of Israel is righteous, as he called for peace between the two. But he never criticised the Jews of Israel, he was criticising the West's treatment of Jews during WW2 and the border. Islamic Extremists, the killed him Misrata Militia killed him. But he was on the run from NATO forces. Now my two cents, I don't think jews are in control of the world, or of any major control of world domination or whatever else you want to spout. I think Israel is a state-operated by the United States to have a permanent foothold in the Middle-East to have a quick method to obtain that sweet dinosaur blood (oil) if push comes to shove throughout the many fights and wars in the Middle-East. An example of this is when Israel sold information and equipment to China, but the US stepped in and demanded that Israel doesn't. Israel caved and met with the US demands. Furthermore, all of these figures were enemies of the United States and more critical of the US instead of Israel. So what sounds more realistic to you? The United States, with their vastly superior resources and reach, killed their enemies? Or Israel, a new nation that has to rely heavily on the US to succeed and is hated by all of their neighbours?