Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

1.1K

Is it possible Hitler killed lots of people, but his motives were not world domination and hatred of one specific group of people? Obviously, this flies in the face of mainstream narratives on both sides. Someone here posted a link to Christiansfortruth, and it seems that Hitler was just trying to take back what he believed, rightly or wrongly, was stolen from his people.

Is it possible Hitler killed lots of people, but his motives were not world domination and hatred of one specific group of people? Obviously, this flies in the face of mainstream narratives on both sides. Someone here posted a link to Christiansfortruth, and it seems that Hitler was just trying to take back what he believed, rightly or wrongly, was stolen from his people.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (55).
[–] • 0 pt

Yes, this is where I am leaning. I think there could be a danger in denying the deaths if the people dying deserved their fate. On tge other hand, if it literally did not happen at all (i.e. no one died) I could accept that as well. I am a flat earther, so I do not mind people thinking I am insane.

[–] • 0 pt

I think there could be a danger in denying the deaths

Acknowledging inaccuracies in claims isn’t denying the deaths. Numbers just don't add up.