Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

1.2K

The only thing it serves to accomplished used traditionally is to censor those you disagree with.

There is no perfect system but I think the way we do it here is better.

The only thing it serves to accomplished used traditionally is to censor those you disagree with. There is no perfect system but I think the way we do it here is better.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (111).
[–] • 1 pt

If I drown out your voice with loud music, am I injuring your free speech?

Preaching an empty platitude doesn't make your case.

[–] • 1 pt

Freedom must allow for ALL use cases. Not just those is some POLICY.

[–] • 1 pt

Not realistic and extremely naive.

Even in the US, much speech is prohibited and the US is the only place on the planet which literally codified free speech protections. It's a human right in the US, per the Bill of Rights.

Care to continue tilting windmills?

[–] • 1 pt

Then it's not completely free.

But we're taking about the hypocrisy in POAL not the us gov.