WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

688

The only thing it serves to accomplished used traditionally is to censor those you disagree with.

There is no perfect system but I think the way we do it here is better.

The only thing it serves to accomplished used traditionally is to censor those you disagree with. There is no perfect system but I think the way we do it here is better.

(post is archived)

[–] 3 pts

It's pretty gay we can't openly downvote known shills and spammers without risking account problems of our own. The ones kept under control on voat had to at least act normal half the time to keep their ability to spam bullshit. Here they run wild. I'm still giving usaconservative a dv every time I see his spam.

[–] 2 pts

Yes but along with Voats system vame a whole host of problems all of it's own.

[–] 0 pt

Did someone censor you by downvoating? Were you being subversive? Were you in a little skirt and asking for it?

[–] 1 pt

OP was a fuckin obnoxious faggot back on Voat, so... Yes he was.

[–] 0 pt

Voat was extremely fucked and shills ran rampant. Hell, shills ran their own subs so they could farm points with idiocy. I'm not sure how this supports your position.

[–] 0 pt

I never said it was perfect. Do you believe this issue outweighs the positives?

[–] 0 pt

Considering a legitimate issue hasn't been raised, IMOHO, your question answers itself.

[–] 0 pt

One of the big problems is that the people on voat with 150,001 upvoats given specifically so they could have 150,000 downvoats for "shills". What is a shill you might ask? Anyone who says anything I don't agree with.

Spammers don't run wild here. Where are you finding someone telling you they make $66/hour online and you can too if you just click this link?

[–] 0 pt

Usaconservative is active here.

[–] 0 pt

I don't recognize the name. What is an example of his spam?