WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

632

The only thing it serves to accomplished used traditionally is to censor those you disagree with.

There is no perfect system but I think the way we do it here is better.

The only thing it serves to accomplished used traditionally is to censor those you disagree with. There is no perfect system but I think the way we do it here is better.

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

Complete and total bullshit. You are now a confirmed liar.

Idiocy that you believed that bullshit would pass muster.

Perhaps it is you who does not understand 'free speech'? Which appears to be confirmed with each of your replies.

[–] 1 pt

Then argue against my point instead of all these ad hominems.

[–] 0 pt

I already did. Repeatedly. My comments destroyed your dishonest position. Each time you specifically avoided answering or provided a nothing, bullshit answer. Mostly, you simply cried.

I'm now pointing out that you're dishonest, evasive, revisionist, and a crying whiner. At which point you dishonestly cry about ad hominem.

Cry some more. 🤪😭

[–] 0 pt

Answer what?

You've only called me names.

[–] 0 pt

I did. I destroyed your position. You cried. Now you lie about it.

🤪😘😭