Science is nothing without scientists. Scientists are humans. Humans are corrupt and flawed.
Ergo science is corruptable and flawed.
The power of the process of science comes from debate and scrutiny, things which are anathema to ideologues.
Yeah just how does this bs belief tie in with muh science concensus? Or paid review? Or that journals hiding public paid for studies behind subscription pay walls? Or that concensus and public science comes from studies and not post peer review of studies? Or that when money is granted to prove an hypothesis studies appear proving hypothesis on demand?
Don't you fuking dare think that science isn't just another competing religion.
Science isn't a religion except in the delusions of people who view at as opposing their religion.
If cvnts like you could refute then you gleefully would have. You refuted nothing. Fuk off back to reddit whence you came.
I get it. I upset the faith you place in science
There's nothing to refute. You haven't established anything.
(post is archived)