Granted, one advantage science has over religion is that claims should be verifiable; problem is that nobody fact check "the science". Or maybe they do, but we just aren't allowed to hear the dissent.
Right now, we live in a version of the dark ages where "scientists" play the role of priests; they decide what people must believe in order to be considered decent citizens.
This is true. It used to be confined to the press, but now a lot of journals have been infiltrated and engage in the same practices. It's almost always by women, usually jewish.
All the money to prove an politically charged idea.
No money to disprove an idea studies
Money is paid to scientists upon publishing.
Non refundandle payouts even if study is found to be flawed.
No money for peer reviewing.
Studies are interpreted by non scientists then announced to the public
The scientific process is the key here. Not scientists. Everyone can engage in science at varying levels. Scientists shouldn't be trusted, only results that people from different groups verify.
Right now, we live in a version of the dark ages...
The Dark Age persists only so long as the proper MODEL is condoned. E.g., the last Dark Age, along with the legitimacy of its promoters, was overturned by the MODEL of Heliocentrism, and by this alone. One model effectively exposed the entire system as fraudulent.
Today, the fraud of academia is fully exposed by their condoning and refusal to even address the CTMU Reality Model, which is wholly analogous to Heliocentrism during the last Dark Age.
(post is archived)