WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

1.4K

(post is archived)

[–] 7 pts (edited )

What if an even larger number of people fail to assess the ramifications of everyone freaking out over small things?

We have very little to fear in this world besides other people's fear. Its pretty much the only sustained threat. With the few other things that can cause calamity like hurricanes. You are very statistically lucky if something like that is what does you in. It comes and goes and if it gets you then it does. But mass panic can ruin things for everyone for a very long time. We could go into a dark ages if people freak out enough and up end civilization to respond to their fears.

Like locking things down and trying to cancel your economy. That's a very very dumb thing to do to address a temporary problem.

I've learned this in life for becoming relatively old. Never address a temporary risk with a solution that could have a permanent consequence. If you adopt that pattern eventually you will catch a few permanent consequences and you'll regret it.

For example, lets say you risk becoming homeless and think that robing a gas station is a solution. That would be very dumb. If you do become homeless, it is temporary. But getting a criminal record is permanent. If your prospects in life are bad now such that you can't afford rent in a random month, imagine what it will be like with that over your head. Never solve a temporary problem with potential permanent risk no matter how bad it seems. I don't care if 50% of the population died from corona virus. If the solution has even a 3% chance of inadvertently ending civilization it's not worth it.

[–] 2 pts

Absolutely. Not too mention, had the virus been a true pandemic, something like 10% of the population was dying or something... they wouldn't even tell us. It's clear at this point there's ulterior motives.

[–] 6 pts

Seems low to me

[–] 4 pts

Yeah I actually think it's more like 80/20. But 10% of dummies might have a smart friend that they follow.

[–] 1 pt

Judging by the peer pressured moral superiority walking around in masks, I'd say that the stupid are certainly common. The scientifically illiterate and media illiterate are drowning us.

It disturbs me because I've wasted time trying not to be like them and disparage everyone else as stupid just to feel smart.

They should be shunned, ridiculed and beaten into corners afterall. kell sepreeeze/s

[–] 2 pts

Why don’t you pm me a picture of your dick This is MaroonSaint. Do it while we’re anonymous. Come on

[–] 0 pt

I sent you a pic of my BBC.

[–] 1 pt

Big breasted chicken?

[–] 4 pts

CBS are a bunch of fucking liars.

And those who do want it to be required need to be captured and beaten.

[–] 3 pts

70% want jewish genetic modification bio-weapon

No. It's less than 5%.

Pay attention anons. There's a (((poll))) every other day saying X and the next day saying the opposite then the next day saying something completely different.

[–] 1 pt

I forgot to see it that way

Everything MSM lies about is for a reason, the number might be less than 5%

[–] 0 pt

That's not the point, the point is that 70% has normalcy bias in regards to current events.

[–] 0 pt

5% may be a little low, but you're correct that it is much lower than this "survey" suggests. Surveys and Polls are used to convince the masses that conform to their agenda, not to properly assess public sentiment.

[–] 0 pt

Hot a sauce for that 5% number? That's a good thing to know.

[–] 0 pt

No that is just my feeling. The literal only individuals I meet that want it or have gotten it are weird haircut + dyed hair + fat + jew + groid or whatever other NPC trait.

[–] 2 pts

Social Darwinism. Those White people that hate their own kind will die out.

[–] 2 pts

If you’re able to keep a calm mind while everyone else is losing their shit and panicking, congratulations: you’re a minority and it’s your burden to carry those idiots.

[–] 0 pt

I don't think that it's our burden to carry those idiots. We tried to tell them, but they kicked us out. They disregarded, mocked, and turned us away. There's no reason why we should have to rebuild the bridge they burned.

[–] 1 pt

Plot twist, Three people surveyed. All pink/purple haired useless HR employees.

[–] 1 pt

50% of people are women, who shouldn't have a say in policy to begin with.

[–] 1 pt

The trick is to make a living profiting off stupid.

[–] 1 pt

So that's why there are so many diverse adverts!

[–] 1 pt

It's probably because they won't wanna face a harsh reality.

[–] 0 pt

70% are way too low. its in the HIGH 80's

Load more (7 replies)