Anne Frank's diary was written with a fine ball point pen. Those were not reliably available until 1950. So it's a fake for sure.
Apparently the guy that wrote the diary sued Anne's father for 50,000 as his payment for writing the diary.
Animals can not pass disease on to humans; fleas, ticks, it does not matter. Most likely she was given an "experimental" shot.
Please read newsletter #1 here about insects: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ozyYy7H363pIb1uIlRs8UwkdmSyqiP_p/view?usp=sharing
Nothing can be transmitted.
Please search for the term "Gallops" and read the paragraphs that follow: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2862332/
Here is the newest and one of only studies of it's kind; where no adhd is found in the non va((inated:
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/22/8674/pdf
Pleomorphism:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/wBkSpjFdC5bm/
Here is a nice video on humoral pathology:
All comes from within the body:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/ZFddXPvsA2AR/
Top Virologist/microbiologist newsletter:
https://wissenschafftplus.de/uploads/article/Dismantling-the-Virus-Theory.pdf
Thank you
Animals can not pass disease on to humans; fleas, ticks, it does not matter.
Stopped reading there. If this were true, malaria outbreaks wouldn't be related to mosquito bites, and bugnets and insecticides wouldn't influence malaria statistics.
Besides, if you read up on old diaries, you'd notice, that pretty much everyone had fleas during ww2.
P.S.
You're inventing fake-atrocities which can be easily disproven, to create a category of "already disproven fake-atrocities" in people's minds, in which they'll intuitively put the real atrocities that have happened, and thereby diminishing them. You're like a jew that invents new bullshit-kinds of antisemitism to make it easier to discard the real arguments for just another bullshit conspiracy.
WTF with this "Animals can not pass disease on to humans..." shit. So the converse is that animals only get rabies by getting bit by humans??? I also bit 6Million mosquitos and ticks to give them every disease under the sun.
I've been looking into this idea that viruses are produced by the body in order to clean up what the bacteria, etc. cannot. It's very interesting and does make sense to me. The only thing I don't get is when there is an outbreak of a virus, if it doesn't spread, how does an area become infected? Is it simply the environmental factors that give the people who live there the same type of contamination in thier body and therefore they all produce similar viral strains with similar symptoms? That would still make sense to me but seems unlikely you'd have a surge of illness, instead you'd think it would be a steady influx of the illness. Also I wonder how many bad outbreaks of viruses there have actually been, maybe they were all bacterial. Either way I saved your comment for further reading, thanks for posting.
What about rabies? Thats eventually fatal unless you get a shot within 24 hours. I remember reading an article years back about a girl who survive rabies after being bitten by a bat in a church. Apparently the only known rabies survivor.
"In Russia during the civil war between the White and Red Armies, typhus killed 3 million people, mainly civilians."
Good luck to you in proving Typhus as a bio-warfare agent during a time and place where it was already endemic...
(post is archived)