he just raises questions meaning he doesnt have his own findings or much declarations
and i mentioned how im not a fan of DMT exploration. its fantastical. aside from him talking about the younger dryas period its like the history channel too much to me. like daniel pinchbeck and mckenna. i like these people, its interesting often enough but these mythos/'dharmas'/etc dont compat. its an eccletic hodgepodge.
he just raises questions meaning he doesnt have his own findings or much declarations
and i mentioned how im not a fan of DMT exploration. its fantastical. aside from him talking about the younger dryas period its like the history channel too much to me. like daniel pinchbeck and mckenna. i like these people, its interesting often enough but these mythos/'dharmas'/etc dont compat. its an eccletic hodgepodge.
(post is archived)