Both the district court and the court of appeal convicted SD politician Bertil Malmberg after he presented facts about the IQ levels of Sudanese. Now the Prosecutor General wants the case to be raised by the Supreme Court.
SD politician Bertil Malmberg was charged with incitement to hatred after he presented facts about the IQ levels of Sudanese. Malmberg was subsequently convicted in both the District Court and the Court of Appeal of the offence of "incitement to hatred".
Malmberg has appealed to the Supreme Court, and now the Prosecutor General's Office (RÅ) wants the case to be taken up by the Supreme Court for a precedent-setting ruling, as Samnytt's Mats Dagerlind was the first to point out.
RÅ believes that a clear provision is needed stating that it is not allowed to discuss IQ levels of different peoples, as it can be "offensive". On the other hand, RÅ believes that it is possible to discuss "education levels".
A conviction of Malmberg in the Supreme Court would de facto prohibit discussion and research on IQ differences between people in Sweden.
source: https://nordfront.se/riksaklagaren-vill-att-hd-provar-om-det-ar-lagligt-att-diskutera-rasers-iq (swedish)
archived & translated (archive.ph) (kudos to StamEm)
(Translated with deepl.com but I don't think they can translate entire pages, just text? I don't want to use goolag translate and Yandex translate isn't good enough, any tips?)
> Both the district court and the court of appeal convicted SD politician Bertil Malmberg after he presented facts about the IQ levels of Sudanese. Now the Prosecutor General wants the case to be raised by the Supreme Court.
> SD politician Bertil Malmberg was charged with incitement to hatred after he presented facts about the IQ levels of Sudanese. Malmberg was subsequently convicted in both the District Court and the Court of Appeal of the offence of "incitement to hatred".
> Malmberg has appealed to the Supreme Court, and now the Prosecutor General's Office (RÅ) wants the case to be taken up by the Supreme Court for a precedent-setting ruling, as Samnytt's Mats Dagerlind was the first to point out.
> RÅ believes that a clear provision is needed stating that it is not allowed to discuss IQ levels of different peoples, as it can be "offensive". On the other hand, RÅ believes that it is possible to discuss "education levels".
> A conviction of Malmberg in the Supreme Court would de facto prohibit discussion and research on IQ differences between people in Sweden.
source: https://nordfront.se/riksaklagaren-vill-att-hd-provar-om-det-ar-lagligt-att-diskutera-rasers-iq (swedish)
[archived & translated](https://archive.ph/kQH8s) (kudos to StamEm)
(Translated with deepl.com but I don't think they can translate entire pages, just text? I don't want to use goolag translate and Yandex translate isn't good enough, any tips?)
(post is archived)