I dont disagree with what you wrote, but I think the opinion article addresses some of your concerns.
The opinion article does differentiate between a crash and a collapse, and while I agree tptb will never give up the reins, I believe they will orchestrate an extreme economic crash. Everything is about perspective.
Give the article a chance, I know it starts off on the wrong foot but maybe you might change your mind, Im dissapointed you feel the need to be so hostile towards this post
I suppose this is an area of discussion I'm somewhat sensitive to, mostly because the majority of my affinity for the financial world manifested in /biz/, which anyone unfamiliar with the place needs to know is a pure cesspool these days. With that in mind, it should come as no surprise to anyone who is familiar with the place that I get a bit hyperbolic when discussing the topic.
I'll say this, though:
I've seen my fair share of Fallout™ Doom Porn, so I don't see how anyone stroking themselves about how right they're going to be when we all are catastrophically inconvenienced at the collapse of the current paradigm to be taken seriously...
Alright, now that explanations are out of the way, I'd like to elaborate on my perspective a little more:
POTUS has hinted non-stop about his intention to destroy the FED with Gold. See Theresa May's cryptic quote about a new trade deal (I think they were speaking about a post-Brexit deal here):
A deal that builds on the U.K.’s independent trade policy; reducing tariffs, delivering a gold-standard in financial services co-operation, and — as two of the world’s most advanced economies — seizing the opportunity of new technology.
This is but one example, but between his old tweets and his his golden tie and the wad of twenties sticking out of his back pocket while boarding a plane the other day (the cash and the tie were same event and same time), his signals are much more than clear.
So, above is precisely why I thought it was just annoying seeing the author mention he's a Roth puppet. I know, I know, he's got a financial team full of faggots , but if you know his process you know it's meaningless considering all of the people he hired and then dumped a few months later, just to make an example out of.
Now we can venture in to the collapse vs crash debate:
The guy describes a collapse as "a succession of crashes leading to a complete erasure of the original society." This is me saying this is literally impossible.
If this happens, we're all doomed and no return will surface in the next few hundred years, which, even then, wouldn't have us anywhere near the beginning of the industrial age. Simply put, tptb are too much filled to the brim with avarice that they would ever let us get close.
In conclusion, a collapse is impossible, but a crash is inevitable.
It's my estimation we see a beginning crash (dollar halved overnight) in the next couple of years, a complete financial restructuring (ie. FED demolished and a bimetal standard) before POTUS ends his presidency and a proceeding golden age the likes of which the world has never seen beginning in the next decade.
Just so we're all on the same page - the Rothschilds have told us several times that they are incredibly bored. Have you ever seen the movie Watchmen? How does it end?
It doesnt seem as hyperbolic as it does pedantic.
History will tell you things will get a lot worse before they improve, I see no negatives in speculating about "doom porn" as you like to call it. Remember we live in a nuclear world with unprecidented power.
Look at who trump associates with, his entire cabinet, financial team and advisors are 90% kikes, most of whom have connections to roths and roth puppets. I suppose only time can tell the whole story.
I do agree that a total collapse is unlikely and that a complete erasure of the original society is a sophmoric notion at best. No argument here.
I agree with your synopsis of the fall of fiat, your sub is full of fantastic information, you dont get enough credit for. I agree with the author, however, that a globalist governement will be installed to "solve" the upcoming planned market crash, it seems the past 100 years have all lead to this moment.
Please elaborate on the watchment reference, it has been a long time since I saw that and youve peaked my interest.
Pardon my brevity, I am feeling ill with a virus and am quite exhausted. Thank you for you time thus far
Kek.
There's no way you don't know you about how much of a pedant I am.
I always think it's funny how people speak about how POTUS let's kikes get close to him. Remember when he wore the prayer shaw? Kikes are probably the only people that are able to appreciate how grotesque a gesture that was. Too bad for them, the Rabbi gave POTUS his blessing, which essentially means all "Jews" must treat him as if he were one of their own.
In short, POTUS is jewing the "Jews".
Finally, I should explain that I often exit conversations in favor of speaking to the general audience. You've earned my respect, so, while I don't think you're above criticismand I'm not afraid to tell you you're wrong, you should probably assume that I'm normally just poking at you.
I love the banter, man. Don't think it means I have any ill will toward you
(post is archived)