So 2023 is the year that science completely died? > Researchers found the female body was better suited for endurance activity “which would have been critical in early hunting because they would have had to run the animals down into exhaustion before actually going in for the kill”. > Citing an example, they said oestrogen, which plays an important role in fat metabolism, helps women keep going longer and can delay fatigue. That's why women have the best marathon times eh? That's why men chug estrogen become better endurance athletes eh? > Wider hip structures also enabled women to rotate their hips and lengthen their steps, said scientists. > “The longer steps you can take, the ‘cheaper’ they are metabolically, and the farther you can get, faster,” they said. This is just embarassing. Women are more flexible yes, but have less muscle mass and are shorter. Again in what endurance sport do women outcompete men? --- Edit: And isn't it strange the the "scientist" is only referred to as Dr Ocobock? Well she is a woman named Cara Ocobock who has previously claimed that that [the view that there are two sexes is wrong.](https://fox40jackson.com/headlines/professor-and-biologist-bashed-for-questioning-the-existence-of-two-genders-in-op-ed-depends-on-context/) So the men/women dichotomy is invalid... but women were better at hunting than men... contrary to all evidence. **Women should be barred from all science**