Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

1.1K

Supposedly the majority of vaccine adverse effects have come from 5% of the batches. These batches are definately not created equal. If a medical-cabal-dictatorship was trying to kill everyone, wouldn't they want to get as much data out of them as possible? One way to do that is to subject the whole population to experimental drug trails. Why would you stop at testing just one drug? So the theory is that in each vaccine is a cocktail of drugs that differs from batch to batch. By recording what batches people got, and requiring anyone who wants to recieve other medical services to have that data associated with them, you can look at their future medical history to determine the long term outcomes of the cocktails they've recieved.

So the people who had their limbs turn black and rot off got one hell of a bad drug. They are being reckless with your health, and that is to be certain. Why not aquire a lot of data out of people if you are willing to be completely reckless with their wellbeing?

Supposedly the majority of vaccine adverse effects have come from 5% of the batches. These batches are definately not created equal. If a medical-cabal-dictatorship was trying to kill everyone, wouldn't they want to get as much data out of them as possible? One way to do that is to subject the whole population to experimental drug trails. Why would you stop at testing just one drug? So the theory is that in each vaccine is a cocktail of drugs that differs from batch to batch. By recording what batches people got, and requiring anyone who wants to recieve other medical services to have that data associated with them, you can look at their future medical history to determine the long term outcomes of the cocktails they've recieved. So the people who had their limbs turn black and rot off got one hell of a bad drug. They are being reckless with your health, and that is to be certain. Why not aquire a lot of data out of people if you are willing to be completely reckless with their wellbeing?

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (21).
[–] • 1 pt (edited )

Get one of each named company's shot to determine if they are using the population as an experiment.

If they are doing it, they would differentiate the tested substances between multiple entities or faces each with their own layer of separation from the original decision.

This is how those really in charge operate. Multiple shell companies and redundancies so your grievances if ever "resolved" never hurt the true decision maker so nothing really changes in the future because the company that got hit was just a pawn.