Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

1.3K

Supposedly the majority of vaccine adverse effects have come from 5% of the batches. These batches are definately not created equal. If a medical-cabal-dictatorship was trying to kill everyone, wouldn't they want to get as much data out of them as possible? One way to do that is to subject the whole population to experimental drug trails. Why would you stop at testing just one drug? So the theory is that in each vaccine is a cocktail of drugs that differs from batch to batch. By recording what batches people got, and requiring anyone who wants to recieve other medical services to have that data associated with them, you can look at their future medical history to determine the long term outcomes of the cocktails they've recieved.

So the people who had their limbs turn black and rot off got one hell of a bad drug. They are being reckless with your health, and that is to be certain. Why not aquire a lot of data out of people if you are willing to be completely reckless with their wellbeing?

Supposedly the majority of vaccine adverse effects have come from 5% of the batches. These batches are definately not created equal. If a medical-cabal-dictatorship was trying to kill everyone, wouldn't they want to get as much data out of them as possible? One way to do that is to subject the whole population to experimental drug trails. Why would you stop at testing just one drug? So the theory is that in each vaccine is a cocktail of drugs that differs from batch to batch. By recording what batches people got, and requiring anyone who wants to recieve other medical services to have that data associated with them, you can look at their future medical history to determine the long term outcomes of the cocktails they've recieved. So the people who had their limbs turn black and rot off got one hell of a bad drug. They are being reckless with your health, and that is to be certain. Why not aquire a lot of data out of people if you are willing to be completely reckless with their wellbeing?

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (21).
[–] • 1 pt (edited )

To the former: "none of" eh. No. There are definitely batches that are the actual (((mRNA gene-editing bio-shot))) and batches that are placebo, this is known and well evidenced.

To the latter: no. That's just dumb and doesn't follow. At all. Mass scale dispersion of an assumed (testing, your words) drug doesn't work. It just doesn't. There are far too many factors at play outside of the drug for any test to be feasible.

The kikes who designed this (the plan and the mRNA gene-editing bio-shot) had a goal and that's obvious. They're targetting Whites and specifically Whites. The mRNA bio-shot has already been tested for years on animal analogues. They all died. That's one batch, the actual mRNA bio-shot batch. The placebo batch clearly doesn't need testing now, in the future, or in the past. It's likely benign saline.

By recording what batches people got, and requiring anyone who wants to recieve other medical services to have that data associated with them, you can look at their future medical history to determine the long term outcomes of the cocktails they've recieved.

Problem: you can get the jew-vaxx without any identifying info being shared. It's not taken seriously. At all. As medical procedures should be. It's just given out at will and forced on people. There isn't a paper trail as that creates evidence.

e: I have a question for OP and others who suggest empty claims such as this: why do you deny the well known, well proven, evidenced reason for the jew-vaxx. That being White genocide and population control? Why is that so hard for you to realize, accept, and admit? All you're doing is tarnishing your own name by making these ludicrous, terribly thought out, zero evidence, zero substance theories.

[–] • 0 pt (edited )

There is a reason why I put this under /s/strangethoughts. Conjecture is something that should occur in a free society. Sometime a thought ends up having legs. It's all a part of the natural conversation of society.

There is a reason why conspiracy theory is often right. Actions tell of motives stronger than words, and motives also tell of actions stronger than words. By looking at behavior we can see motives, and from that we can conjecture quite accurately about additional actions.

There is more than one type of person involved in this plot, each with their own motives. There are some with a profit motive, some with a genocide motive, some with a personal power motive, some with a ideologically communist motive. For a plot to work with all of these parties if needs to give something to each.

So sure, white genocide, but also collect data, create chronic illness, and make profit. I'm describing how both could be met at once as a conjecture. I guess it's wrong to let thoughts be public and I need to keep them hidden away like this is 1984. Better not be too transparent with one's thoughts.