WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

995

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt (edited )

I'm going to return to the idea of a corporation, but frame the problem a bit differently. Corporate leaders - really, anybody with a goal that is sizeable enough - have a fundamental problem: they must rely on other people to achieve their goal, once that goal is beyond a certain threshold in size.

In this day and age, we understand that accomplishing these big goals requires no less than a corporate structure - which is to say, that to achieve a big goal requiring the coordination of hundreds and thousands of people, it takes no less than hierarchical structure, multi-tiered management, shitloads of money, planning at each level, etc., just so that the vision of ownership can transmit down that structure in such a way that it comes out the other end in the way they'd imagined it (whether that's news programming, or a commercial product, or what have you).

Organizing a lot of people to do things in a coordinated way is remarkably fucking hard to do. The reason it is so hard to do is that, even in racially homogenous groups, the fact of individual minds (and personalities, and intelligence levels, and desires, and selfishness) means that getting a group to work as though they were a single organism has been the great predicament of the modern industrial age.

So what I'm troubled by here is both behavioral, psychological, and related to the entire idea of chaos within complex systems.

Even acknowledging that the Jews share a similar revolutionary spirit, which is embedded in each individual, we have the problem of explaining how (as seen in the OP), literally thousands of individuals could demonstrate such uniformity in behavior, even down to phraseology, without a visible structure - like a corporate structure - organizing it.

Here's the rub, if the Jews exhibit such an innate revolutionary spirit, this just compounds our problem of explaining their uniformity! Organizing thousands of people with revolutionary inclinations makes these uniform behaviors even more confusing. Because as I pointed out in my first comment, it is not as if these Jews are all members of the same social circles, the same company, etc. Many of them appear to be just run-of-the-mill people who are getting 5 or 10 retweets. So what we have are thousands of independent people all somehow demonstrating identical behaviors, from which we can abstract a fairly clear shared goal, and I'm wondering how the fuck this actually takes place.

What is the mechanism? I want to know how a people can move like a wave so uniformly without the obvious structure in place that is visibly orchestrating it.

Perhaps this made you think of Nazi Germany. It occurred to me. The thousands of people standing in front of Hitler in straight rows, making the same gestures in unison. The answer here is obvious. Leadership, organization, huge sums of money, a united war effort and very, very visible means for doing the organizing. Therefore, it would be one thing if that kind of structure and leadership were apparent with these thousands of Jews in the United States and elsewhere. So either that structure exists somewhere, and it is perfectly hidden (raising another set of problems), or there is something else at play here, perhaps something defying naturalistic explanations.

This is what I do not know.

Truly, the Holocaust itself serves as another excellent example. Surely, in the wake of the so-called Holocaust, there wasn't a chain letter mailed to every Jew in the world telling them about the scheme to lie about the Holocaust. Do we really believe that every Jew who has professed to seeing the camps, to escaping the gas chambers, recounting their false memories and theatrical horror stories, were ALL operating according to the same orders to do so?

No, they are all moving according to a similar psychology, almost like a race memory, and behaving and speaking with respect to this 'event' with a remarkably identical orientation, and the staggering fact is we believe it never took place. Just imagine a possible world where white people in the United States attempted such a thing (or alternatively, we all apparently believed it really happened). Could you imagine all of the whites in the United States behaving with the same kind of uniformity, the same apparently ingrained belief and conviction, all independently of each other? At the very least, you'd have to imagine that every single one of us shared the same duplicitous intent simultaneously, as though it were being broadcast from mind-to-mind by an invisible satellite dish over each of our heads, beaming false memories into every one of us.

From a moral standpoint, even acknowledging the abstraction of a revolutionary spirit per se, you cannot think that every single Jew is sharing unanimously in the identical desire to deceive and lie. Somewhere there'd be breaks. This is precisely why imagining whites in the US doing the same thing is impossible. We couldn't possibly be organized enough in terms of our agreeability to collectively lie in identical fashion. There'd be disagreements and the story would fall apart.

Look at the situation with Covid-19. We might think that the millions in the US who are in agreement with the mainstream narrative about the virus are evidence of how such a 'meme' could take hold. But look at the half of the country that disagrees. Again, imagine just for a second what kind of structures, money, shared goals, etc. are required just to get half of us to believe one way or the other. I hope I am communicating now what has me so baffled, effectively being that a people so revolutionary could also be simultaneously so identical. If it is impossible to think that this is the result of special, secret orders being mailed to each Jew's house every week, then we have to explain how this could be the case.

I think it is fascinating and immensely frustrating to try to figure out.

@PS @KingOfWhiteAmerica @BurnInHelena

If you guys have any thoughts, jump in.

[–] 0 pt

They have their own private social circles. I got a tiny glimpse into it when a half jew friend of mine showed me. He was the first person to redpill me on the kikes way back when I was an israel first christcuck

[–] 0 pt

As I was saying in the previous comment we may be on the verge of identifying some of the genes responsible for this behavior. We’ve been able to do that with some genes associated with criminal behavior. It would entail some very specific psychological studies in which personality trait would have to be correlated with genes that have high frequencies in jews.

Recently I made the connection that these highly triggered SJWs demanding safe space and accusing you of microagressions were just people that had been trained by jewish psychotherapists to behave like jews do naturally. Those that do it well get a portion of the spoils. They form coalitions well, usually among a few members of the host society as well as other outsiders who also have a stake in dismantling the host regime.

[–] 0 pt (edited )

John 8:44 (biblegateway.com).

When your Father is Satan, you don't need a satellite dish to receive your orders, for "his desires you will do".

We have to understand what the Jewish Revolutionary Spirit truly comprises. It is not a merely human kind of revolution - it is ontological revolution, spiritual revolution - the very same kind of revolution as their father, the devil.

Their identity-defining characteristic is antichristian, therefore, and when one's identity is derived from something preternatural, the problems that typically arise when large groups of humans are placed together cease to be as much of an issue. Yes, Jews still have free will and they still have their own desires, but these desires are subordinated within an inverted Satanic hierarchy, such that, in pursuing their desires, they always ensure to "do the desires of their father, the devil." And this is what unifies them.

The same thing happens to man when he accepts an authentically Christian spirit. He denies himself and serves God. But the Christian spirit has a subordination of desire to God, and thus the hierarchy is not inverted, but angelic (rather than demonic).

Recall the icon perennis - that veritable symbol of the cosmos itself. A circle, with a centre, and a line connecting, by vertical action, the centre to the periphery. The circumference is our world, where we live and perceive, and the centre is God. All wisdom traditions have this much. But Christianity alone has that line, that true connection between the two, in Jesus Christ, and Christianity (inspired by revelation) even affirmed that it alone offered that path to God (John 14:6 (biblegateway.com)).

My point in bringing this icon to mind, is that I have long contemplated the vanity of the world's attempt to achieve Utopia and end conflict on Earth by our own power. That is Satan's lie, the empty promise of the Antichrist still to come. Man forgets that an angel with a flaming sword has been placed at the entrance to the Garden of Eden (Genesis 3:23 (biblegateway.com)); Paradise is inaccessible to us by our own power.

And so as long as we dwell on the periphery of the circle (so long as we dwell in the world of time), then the only unity we can know is through looking at the centre. If our focus is horizontal, merely temporal, some will look clockwise, others counterclockwise, and there will be conflict. Adding a spiritual (vertical) dimension is not enough, for as long as there remains a horizontal component, the vector will radiate diagonally from the circumference, fixing its eyes on demons and the occult or other false gods. Only an authentic vision of God Himself at the Centre can unite us and defy these natural differences between us. But the Holy Trinity, Almighty God, Father, Son, and Holy Ghost is the only true God; He alone occupies the Centre.

It seems to me, then, that there are only two groups that can possibly obtain a single-minded unity in this world: those who explicitly affirm an authentic vision of the true God, and those who explicitly deny this same authentic vision. The former is the Church, typified by the Saints; the latter are the Jews. By rejecting Christ, and defining themselves as antichristian, the Jews nonetheless look toward the Centre - they just do so with hatred instead of love. One might think atheists would have established the same unity, then, but this is not at all what follows. Atheists may have a particular disdain for Christianity, since it is (usually in an inauthentic form) what has annoyed them in their lives and urged a dismissal of theism generally. But their spirits are not, of necessity, defined by 1) a proper understanding of God, and 2) a rejection of Him. In cases where this is true, they become Jews - at least of the same mind. The Jews, however, do have an authentic vision of God; they crucified Him. They know what it is they have rejected: their own Messiah. Their own Scriptures make clear it was Jesus, from Daniel's deadline to all the prophecies of the prophets. But they rejected Him, because He was not what they wanted. Thus they look toward the Centre, but with hate - just as their father the devil does.

@KingOfWhiteAmerica @BurnInHelena @Rawrination

[–] 0 pt

But their spirits are not, of necessity, defined by 1) a proper understanding of God, and 2) a rejection of Him. In cases where this is true, they become Jews - at least of the same mind.

You mean that most atheists typically adopt a lot of progressive values and beliefs I presume?

[–] 0 pt

I mean that what defines an atheist's identity is not, of necessity, an explicit rejection of Christ properly understood. Sometimes this may be the case, but on such occasions I do not think the atheist would be distinguishable from the Jew.

Rather, the atheist is defined by a rejection of theism simply, if the atheist accepts their identity as atheistic, rather than viewing their atheism as a mere accident of who they are. Or perhaps atheism is an accident of their identity, but naturalism is what truly defines them, in which case their identity is a rejection of the supernatural, out of which atheism falls.

My point is that, whether atheism is essential or only accidental, this kind of identity is distinct from the kind of identity that is essentially defined as a rejection of Jesus Christ, and it is this latter identity that defines the Jew, and it is because this is the case that we find an eerie amount of single-mindedness, on certain matters, among the Jews. Jews may disagree on the political strategy - i.e. Zionism vs Communism - but what they all agree on is rejection of Christ. If they no longer reject Christ, they cease to be a Jew - at least in the way that is most notable in our circles. Just as atheists can disagree on progressive vs conservative ideology, but they can't disagree, as atheists, on the non-existence of God - for to do so would disqualify them as atheists! This is my point about the essence of identity.

@Chiro