But I was aroused enough by this that I had to take a second to clap back

As I said before, I dont really want to insult or destroy christian belief system. So apologies if you do take offence. Im just trying to logically work out what makes these people tick and the more I think about the early christian period, the more parallels I seem to draw between that that ideological shift and the current one.

You pointed out that they know what they are doing because they think god punishes them for being bad, but I considered this, and I think they really do lack self awareness, like the cuckoo. When they say God punishes them, its because they didn’t follow some niggling little rule like eating meat off the dairy plate. It isnt because they parasitize people, because their religion teaches that it is just and right that they should rule over (parasitize) people—in fact he commands it. Its not against God’s law to parasitize the goy. Its against god’s law to break kosher, or not keep the sabbath.... stupid shit like that. That’s the religious ones anyway.

The secular commie ones are pretty much the same. They don’t recognize that trying to colonize other peoples country with communist cells is wrong. Their belief is the communism is great and homosexuality is great and all their agenda is just great and that communism fails because somewhere along the way goys fuck up on the implementation.

I reassert that, like the cuckoo, they are not aware that they are parasites. They believe they are victims and they believe that they are a spiritual elect. Even the secular ones think they are morally better than everyone else. I think judaism gives justifications for their naturally revolutionary and exploitive behaviors. I believe the lore of progressive secular jews also does. Two ideologies that fit their evolutionary strategy and natural strengths well.

You point out that christianity is diametrically opposed to judaism. I am not well versed in the theology of either. But it occurs to me the communism conflicts with judaism in a lot of ways too. And like with christianity, communism is not an exclusive race based religion. It proselytizes— everyone can be a communist. Even that everyone must be a communist or that everyone is destined to be a communist in the final phase of history.

I think communism has something similar to christian salvation. It preaches that government can end the cruelty and disparity of evolution. That government can create a perfectly egalitarian utopia with no poverty. This is absurd since poverty is a relative state. But anyway, the comparisons with christianity are pretty obvious.

Communism can work on a small scale with a genetically homogeneous population sometimes. So can christianity.

But when christians propose to save everybody in africa by giving them all our money or bringing them here to be christianized they assume its going to fix africans of their more problematic behavior. But it doesn’t. Same with communism. Because communist culture, like christian culture, doesnt change genes. Even if you explain to blacks the hellenistic or egyptian philosophical underpinnings of christianity, they are still going to rob your house.

Im being a bit flippant, I know. But it strikes me that when you say that people just don’t understand christian doctrine correctly because they havent had the hermaneutics explained to them properly, it sounds like some communists SJWs or antiracists, who keep telling me I need to be educated better on why some women have penises. What seems to me superficially as a problematic aspect of christian belief— an achilles heel like “Turn the other cheek” or “render unto caesar” or “love blacks and whites the same”— christians will tell me is not an achilles heel because Im just not educated in scripture or doctrine. But I see the same explanation used for many other belief systems, especially these BLM-SJW-LGBT activists: “You need to educate yourself”. Its like, no, I don’t. You want me to be indoctrinated.

At the end of the day jews will act like jews, goys will act like goys, chinks will act like chinks, etc. Antiracism cant fix racial disparity because it doesnt change DNA. Not for dozens of generations anyway. And hellenization doesnt change jews. They were selected for a parasitic set of traits before christ showed up. These early christian jews ( yes, Im okay with that word and I dont find it to be a contradiction) changed many aspects of their jewish belief system, largely abandoned the racial aspects of their worship of god. But like secular communist jews, guys like Paul and Peter and the writers of the gospel were still acting like jewish people do. Revolutionary.

Like today with communism, they had produced an ideology that had huge appeal to gentiles. Like today, they built a broad coalition of followers. You explain that the Romans singled out Christianity because it was too attractive to many plebians. I agree. But it seems they didn’t want to co-exist, they wanted to convert everyone and as soon as they were in power, they tyrannically forced their beliefs on the people. Don’t you think when you argue that the decision was just a matter of “doing the sensible thing” to ensure stability, you are being very biased? These leftist jackasses are trying to force their retarded anti-racist, pro-tranny nonsense on everyone. Jam it down our throats or else. But for stability of course. Now that they’ve installed Joe Biden, they are calling for unity. On their terms. Do you not see how its the same thing ?

So the question is, if parasitic jews have survived as a species for so long by following their endogamist, ethnocentric religion, how did it serve some of them to start a new religion, convert all the goys, destabilize the empire and then simply hand off christianity to the goys? Arguably it didnt but because I dont think that they are conscious that their revolutionary behavior is harmful or exploitive — I dont think christ’s disciples felt they were setting out to exploit or harm the roman empire. They were consciously rejecting some of those aspects from traditional judaism. But they were still ethnic jews. They didn’t consider the damage they would do to other people’s cultures and way of life because they are pushy.

I dont know how many ethnic jews were really running the church by the 300s. Maybe they were already comopletely assimilated into the gentile christian population by then. Certainly after the empire adopted christianity, many christians would have benefited immensely in status and wealth. Earlier christians, jewish or otherwise, would have experienced some persecution. But knowing how jews tend to exagerate persecusion, Im forced to question some of that narrative.

One might ask, how does the secular jew benefit from pushing communism and marrying a goy or a black? If jews keep doing that they will assimilate completely. If there is no endogamous jewish population seeding the world with jews that become secular communists, secular communism will eventually be “handed off” to the goy, and it will change to suit the goy, just as christianity has. Christianity really does not have a judaic character, generally, anymore, because it has changed. I was raised catholic. We never read the bible even. Alot of catholic doctrine just is not in the bible. It was added later by Aquinas or Augustine or someone. A goy.

Anyway I do think jewish christians had decendants who benefited from christianity even if they ceased to be ethnically particularly jewish . And jews themselves have benefited in both christian and islamic societies by holding an honored place in those religions. It wasn’t however a plan because jews are not always consciously strategizing to put one over on us, although it seems like it sometimes.

But back to jews in general. I do think they do coordinate, they do transmit information to each other on how to behave. Even though their behavior is very situational and looks like it might require a lot of planning I think the message is very short— a chain mail letter if that letter was very short: go right, not left. Jews have a neural architecture that is highly similar to one another so they are going to behave the same way in many many situations.

Blacks did not evolve to steal nikes. But they keep doing it because they have a gene or genes that make them act similarly when they see nikes. Jews have a gene that makes them act similarly when they see drag queen story hour.

I dont think they are better coordinated. They are highly specialized at social skills and they are a very genetically homogeneous group so they are more likely to think the same way about a thing. So they coordinate better in certain cultural areas. And as revolutionaries, they are not really individualists but contrarians to whatever the traditional cultural rules of a host society espouse.

I know PS and E Michael Jones will say they act the way they do because they are evil or perhaps Satan guides them. That explanation obviously doesnt satisfy me. But what do you think? Do you think this is largely a genetic phenomenon? A learned behavior from their culture. If you do think its genetic, do you think it is possible to identify the genes responsible for the “problems” we see in them? It seems like that should be an objective for many more scientifically oriented WNs, but I never see anyone talking about this. I realize it would be hard to get a grant for this sort of work, but someone needs to get to the bottom of the problem and it has got to be a genetic one imo.

Christianity is of course a way of seeing the world, but it can't be reduced to this. As with Scripture, so with the Church - there are many ways of understanding it. All are true, all are important.

I just finished reading Borella's Secret of the Christian Way. A truly enlightening work. I found the "Threefold Body of Christ" doctrine truly fascinating, but its depth can only be appreciated once someone already has an understanding of how the Church understands itself - and very few people, her enemies especially, actually understand the Church.

There is the Church Militant (those still fighting for salvation against the real risk of damnation, i.e. Christians in the world), the Church Suffering (those who are guaranteed salvation, but who still have impurities and attachments to be purged, i.e. those in Purgatory), and the Church Triumphant (those who have attained salvation, i.e. those in heaven). Borella, drawing on a couple of Medieval theologians, associates this threefold division of the Church - which is the Mystical Body of Christ - with the threefold stages of Christ's Body, as unassaulted (Corpus integrum), as enduring His Passion (Corpus passum), and as glorified / resurrected (Corpus gloriosum). And there is a final threefold division, the Corpus natum, as born, Corpus eucharistum, as sacrament, and Corpus mysticum, as Church. Just as the pre-Passion, Passion, and Glorified Body of Christ is the same Body throughout, so too is the "pre-sacramental" Church, the Blessed Sacrament, and the Mystical Body of Christ is the same Body. And Borella also points out that, just as the essence of Christianity - which you've referred to here - must always have reference to the Trinity, so too must the existence of Christianity (and thus the Church) always have reference to the Incarnation - to the Body of Christ. And unlike an essence, which can be contemplated intellectually but not directly seen, the Body is just that which is seen. And so if the existence of Christianity is inseparable from the Body, the Incarnation, then it is by this Body that Christians must see the world.

And this is the same Body that the Jews crucified, the same Body that by crucifying, Jewish identity is today defined.

So yes, you rightly point out that Judaism and Christianity are diametrically opposed, not just essentially, but in terms of worldview, of existence, of perception.

@BurnInHelena