I can't disprove a negative. The burden of proof is on your side.
Back in the days, before humans started studying and learning science, they thought lightning/thunder happened when the Gods were angry.
I can't disprove a negative. The burden of proof is on your side.
Back in the days, before humans started studying and learning science, they thought lightning/thunder happened when the Gods were angry.
>, they thought lightning/thunder happened when the Gods were angry.
Pfff, pagans...
>The burden of proof is on your side.
You claim this is vapor effect, there's no vapor
>>, they thought lightning/thunder happened when the Gods were angry.
Pfff, pagans...
>>The burden of proof is on your side.
You claim this is vapor effect, there's no vapor
You claim this is vapor effect, there's no vapor
I didn't say vapor. I'm talking about condensation. Two different things.
> You claim this is vapor effect, there's no vapor
I didn't say vapor. I'm talking about condensation. Two different things.
Condensation? This is a TV show set, there's no condensation imagine the cameras and all the gears involved here, you have air conditioning at every floor
Condensation? This is a TV show set, there's no condensation imagine the cameras and all the gears involved here, you have air conditioning at every floor
(post is archived)