Yeah, thanks jew for ruining even this

riuning economy was not enough

Even going off of technology that is known to exist publicly and not involving technologies suspected or indirectly known to exist in secret corporation/government projects, I am still doubtful even when viewing something naturally, in person, with my own eyes depending on the nature of what I am witnessing.

Scenario:

• Numerous spacecraft appearing all around the world in the sky aired on all of the 'news' channels.
• Internet is flooded with recordings from people's phones apparently from all around the world because each video has the voice on it speaking a different language, some male some female, some young and some old, as well as some being day recordings and some night recordings to account for people on the opposite side of the planet where it is night time also seeing and recording them.

I would call it a psyop - just bullshit CGI videos with scripted actors, especially if the voice/people in the videos appear to be a carefully selected "diverse" range of demographics of age/sex/language to hit specific target groups of viewers to instruct them how they should also react to what is shown and heard in the video. Like how a TV show had a laugh track to tell morons that something was a joke and that they should be laughing and how that evolved into the 'leading' style used in The Office of focusing in on a character that represents a target demographic to show their reaction to what just happened or was said so that the viewer of that same group is told how they are also supposed to react to it. That change in leading from a laugh track to visually showing how one should feel about what they just saw coincides with the timing of the internet being flooded with 'Reaction' videos (movie trailer reactions, opening new game system reactions, jumpscare video reactions, etc.) that are used for conditioning, dictating and reinforcing desired behavior.

If I could step out of my front door and see one in the sky myself, I would still call it bullshit holograms/projections/light manipulation, etc. If it doesn't land in front of me and I can visually see its effects on the surrounding terrain (maybe wind, scorching, impressions in the Earth, reflections on surfaces and whether it is also visible in reflections on my windows), or even be able to touch it myself - nope.

Another scenario:

• The population on one side of the planet can see a large object approach (asteroid, etc.) and crash into the Moon, causing it to be visually damaged with debris scattered into orbit around it.
• The other side of Earth who had daytime when it occurred would see recordings of it and then see its after-effects themselves later on when it is night time for them.

I'd have little initial doubt in this instance, but I would still have a little. Whether or not my doubt would drop to none or grow to be very suspicious would depend whether everything about it continues to add up and occur as would be expected (do surface effects persist and develop as would be expected; does the ejecta behave as would be expected and after the proper time for it to reach Earth, does the material affect satellites and also cause 'shooting stars'; etc.).

If it is digital in nature I immediately doubt it. If it is in person but I cannot physically interact with it, I doubt it. If it is in person but far enough away (the Moon) to where I would not expect it to be feasible to generate and maintain a persistent illusion, I tentatively accept it as real but doubt of some degree is a possibility depending on circumstances.

So. How did things turn out with your gf?

I agree. Looks like someone is filming through a window, moving strings of Christmas lights (or similiar) around so that they "dissappear". The "formation" is because they are attached to something to keep them in line.