Dear Morbo, This technology already exists. Conductor and a receiver. Nano wires.. nanotubes? Shot is referred to as software?.. My first post was in jest but I am sober in my response now.
Not sure if the Luciferese is already in the composition or not, but I do know that SM-102 has to be stored in sub freezing temperatures and under certain filters can glow where it is supposed to accumulate. It is definitely pointing to something nefarious.
Are you an electrical engineer? What is your profession?
I've been reading collage level biology and epidemiology and other things since I was 8 years old. As an adult I have been in the healthcare field for 20 years. All this information is out there. The key is to read it slowly and know what you're looking at and make connections if you are just learning about this stuff. It's interesting because "they" are combining technology with biology and creating biotechnology which is essentially making inorganic substances "alive". DARPA was also involved in this technology, namely with hydrogel which is new to this Mrna shot..only a partial ingredients list was published. What we get in the way of research papers and patents on the internet is already outdated to a degree. So, I can't imagine what is out there already.
I hope I don't sound snobby. I'm not in real life. 😊
So you have some practical and professional knowledge and experience in biology, healthcare and epidemiology, but somehow that qualifies you to be able to assess RFI/EMI radiation (as in it radiates not as in it is an atomic/nuclear process) and it's capabilities? All the things that people have claimed about 5G and other high frequency RFI/EMI radiation are based on improperly interpreted data, studies and understandings of the technology. They're junk at best and manufactured disinfo at worst.
As an electrical engineer, I have read a lot of these 'proof' papers and they all have serious flaws and bad assumptions. The reality is you have lived with 5G-type technologies for more than a decade and didn't even know it. Look up WiMAX and you will find it covers the same frequency spread (actually goes beyond 5G frequencies) and that it has much more output power and much longer range. They have been used around the country and other places for more than a decade. The technology enabled mobile carriers to offer 4G on the cheap in areas where they didn't want to spend too much on infrastructure. Cities even installed WiMAX to provide public/municipal WiFi service. It was and still is everywhere. None of the 5G effects happened with it and you didn't even know it was there. Yeah, tell me 5G is bad after realizing you've had it for more than 10 years.
I'm not going to debate you on the biology or epidemiology, but I will certainly debunk you on the electrical engineering end of this. Don't go there if you can't back your claims up without giving me links to videos by idiots spouting gibberish or articles that talk about 'unknown biological fields' or other bunk crap like that. That's not proof of anything other than showing how gullible people can be.
(post is archived)