Christianity's Jewish Origins: An explanation from an Occult perspective

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.

Click here to see all the comments (24).

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

Christianity comes from christans, not some book, not some dead people, but from the living person who observes the religion.

I'm atheist, but used to be christian, and I know what it was like, it was a personal relationship with my perception of god and with my community of fellow believers, I never knew too much about what the bible said, and i never cared, i simply assumed that that the few things i did know were true and good, and mostly my religion and philosophy were more about projecting my personal values onto my faith and it's representations, rather that deriving my personal values from them.

Most christians are like that, they will argue against a 100% biblical position on the basis of practical concerns, personal moral instincts, and other things that are extra-biblical, but instead come from the inside of the christian.

their "objective morality" is just them trying to give more authority to their personal subjective morality by claiming it is derived from their religion, when in truth, it's their "objective biblical" morals being derived from their own personal subjective morals. They lie to themselves, the truth is that It's not about the morality itself, but about the confidence with which you can proclaim it.

It makes sense, however, why would anyone pick up some moral value if it didn't resonate with something within themselves? the fact that some bronze age tome claims it comes from the god that created the world isn't actually going to affect someone's decision to adopt these teachings all that much, in fact, it's usually that we find something in the bible that agrees with what we already believe in, that makes us accept that the god of the bible is real, and it's often not the other way around.

Christians ignore most of the bible, because it doesn't resonate with them, the few parts that do, resonate so because they agree with the biases and beliefs that are already held by these people, biblical morality is the product of the current set of moral values held by christians, and it changes as their values change.

Christianity comes from christans, not some book, not some dead people, but from the living person who observes the religion. I'm atheist, but used to be christian, and I know what it was like, it was a personal relationship with my perception of god and with my community of fellow believers, I never knew too much about what the bible said, and i never cared, i simply assumed that that the few things i did know were true and good, and mostly my religion and philosophy were more about projecting my personal values onto my faith and it's representations, rather that deriving my personal values from them. Most christians are like that, they will argue against a 100% biblical position on the basis of practical concerns, personal moral instincts, and other things that are extra-biblical, but instead come from the inside of the christian. their "objective morality" is just them trying to give more authority to their personal subjective morality by claiming it is derived from their religion, when in truth, it's their "objective biblical" morals being derived from their own personal subjective morals. They lie to themselves, the truth is that It's not about the morality itself, but about the confidence with which you can proclaim it. It makes sense, however, why would anyone pick up some moral value if it didn't resonate with something within themselves? the fact that some bronze age tome claims it comes from the god that created the world isn't actually going to affect someone's decision to adopt these teachings all that much, in fact, it's usually that we find something in the bible that agrees with what we already believe in, that makes us accept that the god of the bible is real, and it's often not the other way around. Christians ignore most of the bible, because it doesn't resonate with them, the few parts that do, resonate so because they agree with the biases and beliefs that are already held by these people, biblical morality is the product of the current set of moral values held by christians, and it changes as their values change.

parent
link

[–] • 0 pt

I agree. Many American Christians are defending rights given to them by non-Christian Founding Fathers.

The big problem however is that Christian is linked to the Jewish God. It was designed by Kikes to subvert and redirect Gentile psychic energy into their own thoughtform (which is programmed to attack Gentiles and bless Jews). This is all laid out in , if you are curious.

So the point being that even if Christians only believe a portion of it, they still tie their energy into it, therefore empowering the "whole deal", so to speak. This also empowers the curse I mentioned above from Deuteronomy to create demographic/immigration crisis in the land of the believer. The Bible is also designed to be a bit flexible for this reason. The Rabbis can "adopt" a pagan culture and twist is slightly so it ties into their Godform power structure. Then they resell this to Gentiles who adopt it as their own, since it is similar enough.

There are other curses within the Bible that "hook" the believer and retain them, despite logical or moral incompatibilities, like you mention. Furthermore, with 1 person the Bible is useless, however with millions and millions of people empowering this Kike thoughtform, it has plenty of energy to do what it was programmed by the Rabbis to do. Therefore, the believers do not have to individually give lots of psychic energy, rather the Rabbis can rely on the sheer number of people to generate the energy instead.

parent
link