At least a spherical, hollow, planet is much more plausible than a flat earth. There exists some various texts, videos and images on the subject. But the amount of evidence is very scarce, which makes it a bit inconclusive: too less evidence may mean the evidence is in fact being hidden away, or, too less evidence may also mean there is nothing there; it's all a bluff... This is one of the subjects that I cannot make up my mind about, it goes in both ways...
At least a spherical, hollow, planet is much more plausible than a flat earth. There exists some various texts, videos and images on the subject. But the amount of evidence is very scarce, which makes it a bit inconclusive: too less evidence may mean the evidence is in fact being hidden away, or, too less evidence may also mean there is nothing there; it's all a bluff... This is one of the subjects that I cannot make up my mind about, it goes in both ways...
It's literally a torus.
Look at an image of a torus.
Imagine it from a perspective looking straight on from the bottom, now the top.
Next, come back to this thread and try to imagine how the two models overlap.
There's more to the Earth than the physical sections.
It's literally a torus.
Look at an image of a torus.
Imagine it from a perspective looking straight on from the bottom, now the top.
Next, come back to this thread and try to imagine how the two models overlap.
There's more to the Earth than the physical sections.
(post is archived)