WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2026 Poal.co

110

Archive: https://archive.today/XvrsA

From the post:

>Starlink operator SpaceX claims that Amazon violated orbital debris requirements by launching satellites into initial altitudes that are too high, increasing the risk of collision with other satellites and spacecraft. SpaceX, which recently reported two Starlink satellite failures that created new space debris, yesterday accused Amazon and its launch partner Arianespace of negligence that “needlessly and significantly increases risk to other operational systems and inhabited spacecraft.”

Archive: https://archive.today/XvrsA From the post: >>Starlink operator SpaceX claims that Amazon violated orbital debris requirements by launching satellites into initial altitudes that are too high, increasing the risk of collision with other satellites and spacecraft. SpaceX, which recently reported two Starlink satellite failures that created new space debris, yesterday accused Amazon and its launch partner Arianespace of negligence that “needlessly and significantly increases risk to other operational systems and inhabited spacecraft.”
[–] 2 pts (edited )

That's funny because I've been discussing about man-made space debris with a friend regarding the Artemis II mission, and they managed to find a perfect window to avoid all the thousands satellites and known/tracked millions debris orbiting earth.

I might be wrong, but I feel like they were only able to achieve it thanks to AI based radars and other tracking systems to define the perfect time and trajectory to avoid collisions with objects.

That might explain why they said they lost the tech to go back to the moon for decades, up until AI became something accessible and affordable. Because, unlike today, earth orbit was pretty clean, back then.

Today they are sending a DEI crew who's doing pretty much nothing but redundantly checking and reporting status/data that Ground Control could do and did with the previous unmanned Artemis mission.