NASA altered, faked, censored, and manufactured data to discredit the fact that vast fields of “yellow” “orange” “purple” puffball and lichen-mushroom-shaped specimens oriented skyward and attached to rocks by hollow stems were likely engaged in photosynthesis thus accounting for oxygen in the atmosphere of Mars. Instead, based on the fabrication and faking of data, NASA claimed these specimens were hematite when the data was a “poor fit” for hematite.
Open the direct link and look at the images. I’m not an expert, but those do not look like outdoor rock formations to me.
[direct link](https://www.researchgate.net/publication/389256460_NASA_Springer_Nature_Cover_Up_NASA's_Frauds_and_Faking_of_Data_The_Truth_About_the_Retracted_Life_on_Venus_Article_Which_Was_Never_Retracted_Fraud_and_the_journal_Astrophysics_and_Space_Science)
> NASA altered, faked, censored, and manufactured data to discredit the fact that vast fields of “yellow” “orange” “purple” puffball and lichen-mushroom-shaped specimens oriented skyward and attached to rocks by hollow stems were likely engaged in photosynthesis thus accounting for oxygen in the atmosphere of Mars. Instead, based on the fabrication and faking of data, NASA claimed these specimens were hematite when the data was a “poor fit” for hematite.
Open the direct link and look at the images. I’m not an expert, but those do not look like outdoor rock formations to me.
(post is archived)