WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

(post is archived)

[–] 1 pt

I conclude our whole government and everything it touches is fake. It's a gigantic money laundering scheme.

[–] 1 pt

Why don't the Chinese just go to the alleged site with their rover and just see for themselves? I really hope we really did go to the moon but if they announced tomorrow that we didn't I wouldn't be surprised.

[–] 0 pt (edited )

PROTECTING & PRESERVING APOLLO PROGRAM LUNAR LANDING SITES & ARTIFACTS In accordance with the NASA TRANSITION AUTHORIZATION ACT OF 2017

What needs “protecting and preserving?”

There are no legal definitions of “preservation” and “protection” precisely applicable to lunar sites and artifacts. However, the Secretary of the Interior has defined “preservation” as “the act or process of applying measures necessary to sustain the existing form, integrity, and materials of an historic property” (36 CFR 68.2.). For purposes of this Report, "preservation” refers to the fact of a site or artifact not being disturbed or harmed, using the Interior Secretary’s definition as a starting point.” Additionally, “protection” means preventing further damage, whether by nature or human activity.

[–] 1 pt

Written in 2018. HA. Since when does China give two fucks about international law or agreements? I want them to haul that shit back and put it on eBay.

[–] 0 pt

Haha, yeah, but it’s more like an update of the original from back in the 70s.