Aaaaaa ha ha, (((Wikipedia))).
Not paying attention to what? Wikipedia ?
NASA? MSM?
Gee, I'll have to pay closer attention to those trusted sources.
Aaaaaa ha ha, (((Wikipedia))).
Not paying attention to what? Wikipedia ?
NASA? MSM?
Gee, I'll have to pay closer attention to those trusted sources.
The whole premise of the argument is based on a perceived oddity in what those sources say, so it doesn't matter their trustworthiness as their claim is self evident in that it is proof of having been claimed and thus there is no hole in the narrative.
The whole premise of the argument is based on a perceived oddity in what those sources say, so it doesn't matter their trustworthiness as their claim is self evident in that it is proof of having been claimed and thus there is no hole in the narrative.
(post is archived)