WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

332

It is closer to Mars or the Sun, yet we have no satellites to study the Moon closer. We can put a rover on Mars, but never on the Moon. Strange, no?

It is closer to Mars or the Sun, yet we have no satellites to study the Moon closer. We can put a rover on Mars, but never on the Moon. Strange, no?

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

Regardless of the premise, the guess is not good because it’s obviously wrong. Even if there weren’t satellites in orbit, it wouldn’t be bacause they gravitationally can’t be

[–] 0 pt

the post was wrong to begin with so making a guess on a wrong premise can still mean the train of thought is right

[–] 0 pt

No. Not having satellites around the moon does not make guessing that it’s gravitationally impossible a good guess. Because obviously it’s not gravitationally impossible

[–] 0 pt

i didnt say it was impossible the original post did, the difference in mass would be the only possible thing i can think of to explain why the moon would not have satelittes. can you think of another possible explaination?