WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

244

(post is archived)

[–] 3 pts

Another unsuccessful try at the .

[–] 2 pts

Pretty epic attempt, one engine failed to light/stay lit from the looks of it.

[–] 1 pt

Same problem as last time. Thought they would have fixed it. Might be a problem with the engines themselves.

[–] 0 pt

At first blush, this appears to be a different root cause - a malfunction in the motor instead of there being a pressurizing problem in the methane header tank.

It took them a few tries to get the Falcon 9 booster landing. Now it's routine. I see no reason why it won't be the same here.

SpaceX. I see why it has that name. You get in one, you become an ex-astronaut.

[–] 0 pt

They were better, smarter, and more tech savy in the 1960s with the moon missions.

[–] 0 pt

Looks like the engines gimbals into each other upon landing maneuvers.

[–] 0 pt

I am quite surprised that this is top priority for Elon - happy, but worried at the same time :)

[–] 0 pt

Thats ok just eject and parachute before landing.

And leave any undesirables that need arkansided to blow up on landing. Get an assasination payment from the clintons to help fund the next launch. Its a win win situation.