Are you too retarded to read what I wrote? What do you mean how did I get there? I'm saying violence is necessary...which is the truth. So when I say that, I'm speaking the truth. Not the hard to comprehend. People are too scared (of being banned, or the feds) to speak that truth...hence this conversation in the first place.
Then what did Tallest say that falls under your category of call to violence? I never saw anything...but I didnt look through his post history. Which, as I've said before, this cancel culture is a slippery slope...soon simple wrongthink will get you banned and a post from AOU saying you're a violent criminal.
disallowing speech that is illegal by law is the same as disallowing wrongthink
...
I explained exceptionally well and you're playing dumb. Either you are dumb, or you're a jew acting by way of pilpul. Pick one. This is a true dichotomy.
"Speech that is illegal" says it all right there. Could you explain to me what "shall make no law..." means in your own words?
Okay great. Then go to your local elementary school, call for vioelence, get arrested and contest the arrest and subsequent charged. You surely will get off with the first amendment which SCOTUS has ruled does not protect threats of violence.
What you're arguing could be used for child porn too with your logic. Are you arguing that child porn should be legal? Because it's not. And just like threats of violence, it is seen as illegal.
(post is archived)