I read comments like yours but they always lack detail. What did you find to be true?
But also just generally a lot of what he had to say about the world. The state of it. Our position in it. The goals and desired outcomes of the oligarchy. Dude knew EXACTLY what is going on around us. The two questions are if the solutions he provided had any merit (little in my opinion) and if they were provided in good faith (i teeter between yes and no on this question)
You think inside knowledge or scripted and pasted talking points won't be used to hook people? This is the thing with shills. If they only spew lies, no one will listen.
The best lies are couched between two truths.
I made it pretty clear that i remain undecided if thats what he was. Suggesting i understand well that he may well have been.
I would be lying if i said the perspective he provided didnt influence my views. Which is not at all to say that i agree with his solutions. But the truths he provided held value when taken as their own information separate from his constant calls to violence.
I may actually have spent more time talking one on one with him than anyone honestly. I studied him for weeks. I lean towards violence inciting shill. But there were times when he spoke such blunt and accurate truth, after years of prodding, that it made me question that conclusion.
His statements on race mostly.
(post is archived)